There can be a point  when circumstances in life get so desperate that we will go to extraordinary lengths to just simply “get by.” Mary Ann Bevan, an extraordinary woman found herself in that situation after suffering  a series of tragedies in the early part of the twentieth century. This is the extraordinary yet tragic story of Mary Bevan who found fame and fortune as “the ugliest woman in the world.”

Steve Prout explains.

Mary Ann Bevan.

The early life of Mary Bevan

Mary Ann Bevan (nee Webster) was born in December 1874 in Plaistow, London. She became a nurse at 22 years of age and proceeded to lead a normal and unremarkable life. Mary herself was one of eight siblings. In 1902 she married a Thomas Bevan and had four children, two boys and two girls. In 1914 her husband Thomas sadly died, leaving her to fend for herself and her children. If that was not enough, at the age of 32, Mary was the struck with a rare medical condition called acromegaly which made life even more difficult - and left the grieving family in a desperate financial situation.

Acromegaly is a rare medical condition that creates abnormal growth around the face resulting in distortion. The condition also has other side effects such as eyesight deterioration and crippling headaches which Mary also suffered. Due to this she was unable to continue working as a nurse and now was only able to earn money by performing odd jobs at infrequent intervals. This was not enough to support her family of four children and the financial pressures mounted. However, in a bizarre twist of fate an opportunity presented itself  which would accord her unexpected fame and fortune.

 

“The Worlds Ugliest Woman” and the Coney Island project

In 1919 Mary entered and won a competition to find “The World’s Ugliest Woman,” that presented her with other opportunities for her to earn a living that would change her life and fortunes forever. By 1920 Mary commercialized her appearance with the help of a Samuel Gumpertz. Grumpertz, along with J T Ringling, were the main leaders in this field of entertainment. Grumpertz was also the talent agent for Harry Houdini and Ringling’s own organization would later become the world famous  Barnum and Bailey traveling circus.

May soon found herself  profiting from various public appearances and performances. Grumpertz then  hired Mary to appear in the Dreamland Sideshow at Coney Island, USA. Mary would also work in the Ringing Brothers Circus.

Mary Bevan was not the only attraction in the Coney Island show, which was also known as the "Congress of Curious People and Living Curiosities.” During its heyday the crowds would be entertained by such acts as Baron Paucci (aka Peppinio Magro) who was presented as the "world’s smallest perfect man". Paucci was an Italian who was only two feet tall. William Johnson, also known as Zip the pinhead or “zip what is it”, possessed a tapered head and his act was pretending to be “the missing link” in human evolution. There was also a Dog-Faced Boy called Lionel, real name Stephen Bibrowski (1890-1932). Other  acts included a band of Philippine Bantoc tribe members, the Wild Man of Borneo, and Ubangi "Platter-Lipped" women. His greatest attraction was the half-scale Lilliputian Village that he also situated at Dreamland where hundreds of small people lived in a self-contained community for spectators to view.

 

Conclusion

Even in Mary’s times there were critics and disapprovers of these shows. Gompertz’s sideshows were seen by some as being exploitative, which is a is a fair statement for one side of the debate; however, from another point of view, these performers were reported to make “a good living” which otherwise would have been impossible for many given their individual circumstances. In a time where society was less inclusive, entry to the normal profession or vocations would have been difficult if not impossible. Apart from the financial gain, the sideshow offered the individuals a comradeship and community support that they may not have found in wider early twentieth century society.

 Among those critics was Mary’s doctor. In May 1927 he wrote to Time magazine out of concern for people like Mary, criticising the industry for its exploitative nature. However, from that industry he condemned, his patient had become a celebrity and afforded her means to support her children and their education. It is estimated that from her numerous appearances, picture postcard sales, and sales of miscellaneous merchandise she earned over fifty thousand dollars (the equivalent of some one million dollars today). It was a considerable sum that she never would have achieved from her former nursing career. Some of Mary’s peers also prospered. William Johnson (aka “Zip”) apparently “made a better living than most sideshow performers” not just from his performances but from several successful and shrewd investments, which included a chicken farm in Nutley, New Jersey.

Mary died on Boxing Day in December 1933. She was laid to rest at The Brockley and Ladywell Cemeteries in London. The story of Mary Bevan can be read by the audience as one of triumph over tragedy. Alternatively, it can be read as the story of a woman forced with little choice into the fringe of society and exploited for her unfortunate looks by a wealthy and established entertainer - but that is up to the reader to decide. Not all personalities that make it into the history books are great states-people, warriors, rulers,  inventors, or dictators. Some can be just ordinary people trying to lead ordinary lives.

Smedley Darlington Butler stands as one of the most formidable and paradoxical figures in United States military history, a Marine whose career traced the arc of American power abroad from the age of imperial interventions to the disillusionment that followed the First World War. Born on the 30th of July, 1881 in West Chester, Pennsylvania, into a prominent Quaker family, Butler's path to martial life seemed at odds with his upbringing. His father was a U.S. congressman, and the family tradition emphasized public service, but not violence. Yet at the age of sixteen, stirred by the outbreak of the Spanish–American War and driven by a precocious sense of duty and adventure, Butler lied about his age to secure a commission as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Marine Corps. That impulsive decision began a career that would see him repeatedly at the sharp edge of American foreign policy.

Terry Bailey explains.

Smedley Butler early in his earlier years - said to be 1898. From the Smedley Butler Collection (COLL/3124), Marine Corps Archives & Special Collections, available here.

Butler's early service immersed him in the era's so-called "small wars," interventions designed to protect American interests overseas. He fought in China during the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, where multinational forces moved to relieve foreign legations besieged in Beijing. There, Butler was wounded in combat and displayed the aggressive leadership that would become his hallmark. He later returned to China during subsequent interventions, gaining firsthand experience of expeditionary warfare in unstable political environments. These deployments, along with service in the Caribbean and Central America, shaped Butler into a hardened officer who believed that personal example—leading from the front under fire—was the essence of command.

The first of Butler's two Medals of Honor was earned during the U.S. occupation of Veracruz, Mexico, in April 1914. The intervention arose from the chaotic conditions of the Mexican Revolution and a diplomatic crisis triggered by the Tampico Affair, in which U.S. sailors were briefly detained by Mexican federal forces. Determined to prevent a shipment of arms from reaching the regime of Victoriano Huerta, President Woodrow Wilson ordered the seizure of Veracruz. Butler, then a major, found himself in intense urban combat as Marines and sailors advanced street by street against determined resistance. Over two days of fighting, Butler repeatedly exposed himself to enemy fire while directing his men, maintaining momentum amid confusion and danger. His conspicuous bravery, calm leadership, and disregard for his own safety were credited with helping to secure key objectives during the assault. For this conduct, he received the Medal of Honor, recognizing his extraordinary heroism in a complex and politically sensitive operation.

Butler's second Medal of Honor came the following year during the U.S. intervention in Haiti, another campaign rooted in American concerns over political instability and foreign influence in the Caribbean. In November 1915, Butler led an attack on Fort Rivière, a stronghold held by Caco insurgents resisting the occupation. The fort, an old French structure perched atop a steep hill, was considered nearly impregnable. Rather than ordering a prolonged bombardment, Butler personally led a small assault force up the hill under fire. Discovering a narrow entrance, he and his men forced their way inside and engaged the defenders at close quarters. The sudden, aggressive attack collapsed the resistance within minutes. Butler's decision to lead the assault himself, coupled with his audacity and tactical judgement, was deemed decisive. Awarded a second Medal of Honor, he joined a very small group of Americans to have received the nation's highest military decoration twice.

During the years that followed, Butler's career continued to reflect the expanding global reach of the United States. He served on the Mexican border during the 1916 crisis sparked by Pancho Villa's raids, helping to secure frontier regions amid fears of wider conflict. When the United States entered the First World War, Butler was promoted to brigadier general and assigned logistical and training responsibilities rather than frontline combat. Most notably, he commanded the Marine base at Brest in France, where he worked to impose order and efficiency on a massive, chaotic port operation essential to sustaining the American Expeditionary Forces. Though frustrated by bureaucracy and the lack of combat command, his energy and organizational drive earned him respect and further advancement.

After retiring from the Marine Corps in 1931 as a major general, Butler underwent a profound transformation. Drawing on his decades of experience in foreign interventions, he became an outspoken critic of American militarism and corporate influence over foreign policy. His 1935 pamphlet War Is a Racket argued that many of the campaigns he had fought in served economic interests rather than national defense, a striking repudiation from one of the most decorated Marines in history. Butler spent his final years lecturing and writing, admired by some for his candor and criticized by others for his blunt attacks on the establishment. He died in 1940, leaving behind a legacy defined by extraordinary personal courage, relentless leadership in battle, and a rare willingness to question the very system he had served so ferociously.

Smedley Butler's life captures the contradictions of his age: a fearless warrior of America's overseas expansion who later became one of its sharpest internal critics. His two Medals of Honor testify to moments of undeniable heroism under fire, while his later words invite reflection on the costs and purposes of the wars that shaped him. Few American military figures embody both the triumph and the unease of U.S. power abroad as fully as Smedley Darlington Butler.

Smedley Darlington Butler's story ultimately resists any simple verdict, and it is precisely this complexity that secures his enduring significance. As a young Marine officer, he personified the aggressive confidence of a rising power, repeatedly placing himself in harm's way and earning the devotion of the men he led through sheer physical courage and uncompromising example. His two Medals of Honor were not products of chance or symbolism, but of a consistent pattern of behavior: decisive action, personal risk, and an unshakeable belief that a commander's duty was to share the dangers of those he commanded. In this sense, Butler stands comfortably among the most formidable combat leaders in American military history.

Yet it is the second act of his life that elevates him beyond the narrow confines of martial achievement. Butler's post-retirement denunciation of the very interventions that had defined his career did not erase his service; rather, it reframed it. Few figures have possessed both the authority and the moral courage to interrogate their own legacy so publicly. When Butler condemned war as a racket, he did so not as an outsider or a theorist, but as a man who had fought, bled, and commanded in the field. His critique drew its power from lived experience, forcing contemporaries—and later generations—to confront uncomfortable questions about the relationship between military force, national interest, and economic power.

In the end, Butler's legacy lies not only in the battles he fought or the decorations he earned, but in the intellectual honesty with which he confronted the meaning of those experiences. He remains a symbol of both the heights of personal bravery and the capacity for reflection and dissent within the military tradition itself. In embodying the courage to fight and the courage to question, Smedley Darlington Butler occupies a rare and uneasy place in American history—one that continues to challenge how heroism, patriotism, and power are understood.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

 

 

Notes:

Tampico Affair

The Tampico Affair was a brief but consequential diplomatic incident between the United States and Mexico in April 1914, occurring during the height of the Mexican Revolution. At the time, Mexico was deeply unstable following the overthrow and assassination of President Francisco Madero in 1913, an event that brought General Victoriano Huerta to power. The United States, under President Woodrow Wilson, refused to recognize Huerta's government, viewing it as illegitimate and born of treachery. This tense political backdrop meant that even minor incidents carried the potential for serious international repercussions.

The affair itself began on the 9th of April, 1914, when a small group of U.S. Navy sailors from the gunboat USS Dolphin went ashore at the Mexican port of Tampico to purchase fuel. They were arrested by Mexican federal troops, who suspected them of entering a restricted military area. Although the sailors were quickly released once their identity was established, the local Mexican commander failed to offer a formal apology. Rear Admiral Henry T. Mayo, commanding U.S. naval forces in the area, demanded not only an apology but also a 21-gun salute to the American flag as a public gesture of respect.

Huerta's government agreed to issue an apology but refused to authorize the salute, arguing that it would compromise Mexican sovereignty and imply submission to the United States. President Wilson seized upon the refusal as evidence of Huerta's hostility and disrespect, and he used the incident to seek congressional approval to employ armed force. The Tampico Affair thus became less about the arrest itself and more a symbolic confrontation over national honor, legitimacy, and diplomatic recognition.

The immediate consequence of the affair was the U.S. occupation of the port of Veracruz later in April 1914, aimed at preventing a German arms shipment from reaching Huerta's forces. While the occupation was not a direct response to the Tampico incident alone, the affair provided the political justification Wilson needed to escalate U.S. involvement. In the broader context of U.S.–Mexican relations, the Tampico Affair exemplified how revolutionary instability, wounded national pride, and great-power diplomacy could rapidly turn a minor local misunderstanding into an international crisis.

What? You know not what you do was muttered by Nicholas just seconds before he and his family were executed by a Bolshevik firing squad on the night of the 16th-17th July 1918 in Yekaterinburg, Russia.  Whether he truly spoke them or not, they have come to define the tragedy of a man condemned not only by revolution but by history itself. Yet a question still lingers of how did a man born into extreme privilege end up facing executioners in a dimly lit cellar?

The answer is tangled in tragedy, misunderstandings, and myths. Nicholas’s legacy has been dominated by his weak, cruel, and helpless character – yet each story tells us much about those who wrote it as it does about Nicholas himself. 

He was seen as weak, yet every choice was bound by conviction. A ruler so certain by his divine calling that he mistook faith for strength and in the end, belief, not hesitation undid him.

Sophie Riley explains.

Nicholas II and family in a formal photograph, c. 1904. Source: Boasson and Eggler St. Petersburg Nevsky 24, available here.

The Weak Autocrat

For over a century Nicholas has been portrayed as a weak out of touch ruler who caused the collapse of the Russian Empire. A man who was too passive and indecisive. A Monarch who waited for divine intervention to act, this belief showed his conviction in his power being sacred and not political.

Nicholas II was crowned Russia’s Tsar on the 26th May 1896 in Moscow’s Dormition Cathedral. During the ceremony the Tsar was blessed with holy oil and took communion. These acts symbolised that he was blessed by God to rule. In addition to this Nicholas also recited traditional catholic prayers that he would later reference as reasons why he could not concede to a constitutional and parliamentary government.

Nicholas’s Orthodox faith served as his political compass by reinforcing his divine right to rule as an autocrat. In doing so he believed that any attempted to weaken his power was betrayal of his sacred obligation to God.  This deep conviction was the core of his political ideology Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality. However, this belief would come at a cost during the 1905 revolution where he authorised the use of force to restore order, sanctioning repression which in turn cost the lives of hundreds of Russian people. Later that same year he was forced to concede to the October manifesto and create the Duma which he would consistently undermine and dissolve twice.  

These were not the actions of a ruler that was paralysed by doubt. They show a Monarch that acted decisively when he felt that the foundation of his autocracy was being threatened.  His tragedy lay not in failing to choose but in repeatedly choosing to prese4rve an absolute system that could not survive.

As a ruler the Tsar appeared to be detached from reality of modern governance to this around him, particularly those who within his political and diplomatic circles.  The British Ambassador Sir George Buchanan would describe him as lovable man with good intentions but ultimately not born to set Russia right. — a judgement that would echo through later historical accounts.  His ministers would claim that his decisions were too slow, consultations limited and crises were met with silence.  His people would describe him as bloody Nicholas am a responsible for military failures and repression.

This perception hardened into myth.  Revolutionary propaganda transformed quiet conviction into incompetence. Later, Soviet histography framed Nicholas as a symbol of decaying autocracy.  Yet modern historians would suggest that it was rigidity and refusal to change that led to the downfall of the tsar not weakness.

Nicholas did not lose his throne because he lacked will power, he lost it because his will was anchored to the belief of Autocracy above everything and his unwillingness to change. His mistaking in a divine right to rule remained in a world that was changing and moving on without him.

This rigid devotion, increasingly reinforced by those in court would soon find its most controversial expression in the figure of Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin

 

Rasputin’s Puppet: The Tsar and the Romanovs

The name Rasputin goes hand in hand with the downfall of the Romanov family. Rasputin a charismatic Siberian man with captivating hypnotic eyes was seen by many as healer especially when he rehabilitated Tsarevich Alexei's haemophilia with soothing prayers.  However, to others he was deemed the manipulative mad monk who destroyed Russia’s royal family with his alleged heavy drinking, sexual exploits, and his influence over the Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. This negative portrayal has deemed him as a dark force behind the Romanov decline as they steered Russia towards ruin. In the popular imagination Tsar Nicholas’s image was eclipsed by a peasant holy man whose influence symbolised moral and political decay.  

Rasputin’s power was not in governance but in privacy with the royal family where his charisma and charm would gain him affection and admiration for the Tsarina and later on he would gain the respect of the Tsar. Though he never held any political position Rasputin occasionally offered his opinion on ministerial appointments, but it was Nicholas who had the final word.  Surviving correspondence highlights that Nicholas would listen to Rasputin’s opinions and then later dismiss them in their entirety. Therefore, Rasputin’s influence was inconsistent and exaggerated by the liberal press and aristocratic opponents.   

The real damage caused by Rasputin was symbolic in terms of his assumed outrageous and occasionally devious behaviour that shocked the public and scandalised the court.  During World War1 when Russia was suffering in every aspect of daily life, the image of the corrupt mystic whispering in the Tsarinas ear proved devastating when the monarchy stayed silent, allowing the myth to eclipse fact.  

When he was murdered in December 1916 by members of the aristocracy Rasputin’s image and legend was already solidified and eclipsed his reality. His death failed to secure the monarchy’s survival as the people’s belief in Rasputin’s power had become inseparable from   their belief in the monarchy’s collapse.  Therefore, Rasputin did not bring destroy the Romanovs but he did become a symbol through which enemies explained their fall.

 

The Cold-Hearted Monarch

Nicholas II is often remembered as an emotionally distant ruler who unmoved by the suffering of his people. His diaries are famously spare and restrained, he recorded moments of national crisis like weatherman reporting the weather. He famously described the execution of peaceful demonstrators on Bloody Sunday in 1905 as painful and sad but he did not show any outward grief or remorse. To many contemporises this highlight the Tsars lack of empathy.

However, this detachment should not be excused for indifference. Nicholas believed deeply in his role as paternal ruler who was there to guide his people through his morals and spirituality. He saw himself as a father figure who preserved peace and stability not a distant tyrant who caused destruction at any cost.  His world view helped shape his response to civil and global unrest.

His inability to express emotions publicly, or respond to tragedy in ways expected by a modern ruler, proved disastrous. At a time when mass politics demanded   visibility, compassion, and reform. Nicholas offered prayers and silence.  Silence, restraint, and faith where his tools.  In an age of upheaval these tools would prove fatal.   

The myth of the cold-hearted monarch soon evolved into something darker. Nicholas was no longer merely distant he became historically the architect of Russia’s ruin.

 

The Architect of Collapse

Nicholas II is described as the architect of Russia’s collapse, a man who had designed his empire ruin with intent. However, he inherited an empire strained by contradiction. During the 20th century Russia remained autocratic in form but modern in pressure: a diverse population was governed through personal authority over durable institutions. Land hunger, civil unrest and the absence of meaningful political participation created fault long before Nicholas’s reign. His tragedy was not that he created weaknesses, but that he trusted Russia’s fragile state to withstand an age of crisis.

The First World War transformed Nicholas’s weakness into a catastrophe. Mobilisation of the Russian military strained an already fragile economy, and shortages turned hardship into anger. In 1915, Nicholas made the fateful decision to assume personal command of the Army, tying the monarchy’s fate to military success. Defeat at the front became failure at the throne. While Nicholas remained at headquarters, the capital endured inflation, hunger, and political paralysis. Authority, once rooted in ritual and belief, now competed with queues for bread.

By February 1917, collapse arrived in the way of strikes and demonstrations. As a result, Nicholas abdicated not in the face of a victorious revolution, but because no one remained willing to defend him. His final act was framed as duty rather than defeat, a sacrifice for order rather than a concession to force. The monarchy fell less through overthrow than through abandonment.

Furthermore, this highlights that Nicholas was not the architect of collapse, but its reluctant engineer. He did not build the conditions that destroyed his reign, but he refused to redesign them. The empire he inherited required transformation. The empire he governed received preservation instead. Between the two, the Romanov dynasty slipped quietly into history. By 1917, Collapse was no longer an act of revolution but a result of quiet consequences of belief, war, and abandonment.

 

The Luxurious Last Days

In popular memory, the Romanovs passed their final months cocooned in comfort while Russia starved. It is a compelling image, shaped by revolutionary propaganda and long resentment toward imperial privilege. The reality was plainer. After abdication, the family moved from palace to house arrest, from Tsarskoe Selo to Tobolsk and finally to the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg. With each move, splendour gave way to supervision, routine, and confinement.

They were not destitute. They had books, warm clothing, and enough food when others did not. Yet in a nation ravaged by war and shortages, even modest security appeared obscene. The myth of luxury therefore served a purpose: it transformed execution into reckoning. Their final months became not simply a story of captivity, but a moral judgment on who they had once been.

 

The Man Behind the Myth

 Not long after his execution Nicholas II had already been replaced by a plethora of myths that called him a weak autocrat, a tyrant, and the architect of Russia’s collapse. These myths endured because they offered clarity over historical contradiction. Stripped of his mythological caricature, Nicholas appears neither as a monster nor a martyr, but a ruler shaped by his underlying belief.  A man devoted to duty and family, a man who was also fatally unsuited to the political age he ruled.

His tragedy lay in the collision between conviction and change. Where his world demanded adaptation, he offered continuity; where it required compromise, he held to authority. To look beyond the myths is not to excuse his failures, but to understand them. Nicholas II did not lose his throne because he was uniquely cruel or foolish, but because the values that sustained him could not survive the century he inhabited. Was Nicholas II judged for what he was — or for what Russia needed him to be?

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

Battered by wind gusts, the Avro Lancaster bucked and lurched as its crew struggled to keep the plane aligned with the signal fires set by the French Resistance fighters two thousand feet below. The “Lanc,” one of the Royal Air Force’s (RAF) workhorse bombers, was a homely beast. It had four noisy propellers, a protruding snout, and a pair of ungainly tail fins. Built to drop bombs four miles above Dusseldorf and Dresden, the Lanc was ill-suited for the stealthy parachute operation it was being asked to perform in the predawn hours over Occupied France.

Here, Timothy Gay continues the story of Stewart Alsop. Part 1 is available here.

The instant Lt. Stewart Alsop leapt from the Lancaster, Sgt. Dick Franklin realized that Team ALEXANDER’s leader had messed up. Franklin was so rattled by his commander’s gaffe, he confessed in his memoirs a half-century later, “that I didn’t know whether to shit or go blind.”

With the RAF’s rookie jump master screeching “No!” Franklin grabbed French Lt. Richard Thouville and kept him from following Alsop through the hole. As the radio operator, Franklin knew that the Jedburgh mission could ill afford to have all three principals dumped willy-nilly atop the French countryside.

The Lanc continued to drone southward. Within a few minutes the crew had feathered its engines, which dropped its altitude by a thousand feet or more. Soon enough, the jump master was flashing a red light and hollering “Go!”

One at a time, Thouville, Franklin, and the SAS troopers all plunged through the hole. The inexperienced Canadian airmen had done a yeoman job maneuvering the Lanc close to the Maquis’ L-shaped groundfires – or so they thought at the time.

Franklin, a golf enthusiast, landed some 150 yards left of the fires, “about like my normal bad hook,” he kidded years later.

He alighted smoothly enough but stumbled after impact; fortunately, his helmet stayed put as his chest banged against the ground. Unhurt, he popped up, and began retrieving his chute. He heard shouts, dropped the chute strings, and reached for his rifle, but was relieved to see friendly French citizens waving as they ran toward him. They were members of the Resistance reception committee.

Leave your chute – we’ll take care of it later, they told Franklin. They escorted him up a slight hill toward the groundfires. As they crested the ridge, a nervous Maquisard apparently mistook Franklin’s helmet for a German coal scuttle and opened fire. Fortunately, he was a lousy shot; no one was hurt and his Sten was quickly silenced.

Trying to get his bearings, Franklin began asking questions about their location and strategic situation. To his chagrin, he sensed that Team ALEXANDER had parachuted onto the wrong Resistance stronghold.

He learned that they were in the Haute-Vienne Department, some 70-kilometers northeast of their intended target – the BERGAMOTTE Resistance cell operating close to Limoges in the Creuse Department. In truth, there were so many Maquis groups going full-tilt in southern and central France in mid-August 1944 that it was tough for an air crew to figure out which set of bonfires was the correct one!

The Maquisards assured Franklin they would look for Thouville and Alsop. They motioned toward a peculiar-looking sedan and told Franklin he would be driven to their farmhouse headquarters. Just as they were climbing in, Thouville emerged from the other side of the bonfires, “full of piss and vinegar,” Franklin recalled.

Thouville’s chute had gotten snarled in some high-tension wires. He avoided electrocution but was frustrated that it took so long to cut himself loose. It also angered him that despite his best efforts, his chute stayed wrapped around the wires – a beacon for enemy patrols, he knew from his training.

Franklin, meanwhile, was fuming about the condition of his wireless set, which had gotten banged up upon landing. To make matters worse, Alsop, their commander, was nowhere to be found.

Thouville and Franklin were bemused by the bizarre-looking car driven up by the Maquis. Like many Resistance vehicles in the summer of ’44, it was a Gazogene, an ingenious contraption that ran on fuel generated by burning charcoal in a makeshift “oven” mounted on its front or back fender.

Gazogenes were smelly and temperamental, Franklin recalled, and tended to break down at the “most inopportune times.” But the charcoal miracles were helping to make the Maquis a far more mobile and lethal fighting force than was understood by Allied intelligence in London. The SOE-OSS brass was still under the mistaken impression that the Resistance operated almost strictly on foot.

They squeezed into the car, and with “headlights blazing,” rumbled down a dirt road toward the cell’s redoubt. Thouville and Franklin were amazed that the Maquisards were so brazen. Many were sporting bleu, blanc, et rouge armbands and not even pretending to be stealthy. On top of the Sten gun erupting, there had been a lot of noisy excitement around the groundfires. The clunky Gazogene, moreover, was making a racket as it lumbered toward the farmhouse.

Clearly, the Germans had lost control of the remote areas of the Haute-VIenne, if they ever had it – another fact not appreciated by Allied intelligence in August of ’44.

Thouville and Franklin’s first order of business was to meet up with the Maquis leadership and get a rundown on logistics and enemy strength; their second was to find Alsop – if, that is, he was findable. Their best guess was that Alsop had bailed out some 10 to 15 kilometers north of their position.

When Thouville and Franklin arrived, an impromptu party with Resistance fighters of both sexes was going full-bore at the farmhouse. The two Jeds were greeted with hugs, wet kisses on both cheeks, and copious amounts of wine. To Franklin, basically a teetotaler at that point, it tasted like vinegar.

Once the leaders began their briefing, it soon became evident that Franklin’s fear was correct: ALEXANDER had indeed been dropped in the wrong spot. The local Maquis leaders had requested from London gasoline, medical supplies, and a medic to patch up their wounded – not a team of commandos.

The Resistance guys were desperate, especially, for gas to run the cars and trucks they needed to conduct surveillance and hit-and-run raids. For months, they had subsisted on gasoline stolen from German supply depots. But once the enemy’s gas supplies began to wane, so did the Maquis’. With decent amounts of gas parachuted in from Britain, the guerillas could inflict even more damage, they told the Jeds.

If Thouville and Franklin were going to inflict optimal damage on the Wehrmacht, they would need to locate their team leader – and fast. With Allied invasion forces from the Riviera landings soon pushing the enemy northward, some 30,000 additional German troops would come crashing into south-central France, many of them looking for an escape route eastward through the Belfort Gap, the flat terrain between the Vosges and Jura Mountains.

 Thouville that early morning organized a search party consisting of three Gazogene trucks-worth of Maquisards; he directed Franklin to stay at the farmhouse and tend to the radio. The three lorries with the strange ovens on their fenders lurched northward.

    *

Unlike his Jedburgh comrades Alsop and Franklin, Lt. Renè de la Touche, aka Richard Thouville, was a military professional through and through. A graduate of St. Cyr, the French West Point, he was tall and slender; his demeanor, like his posture, was ramrod straight. His large ears and elongated nose protruded out from under his British Army cap. While fighting with the Free French in North Africa in ’42 and ‘43, he had been awarded the Croix de Guerre avec Palme.

At first, Franklin and Alsop found Thouville aloof. Eventually, though, the Frenchman loosened up, betraying a wicked sense of humor. But Alsop chose him as his Jed partner because he saw him as imperturbable; his discipline, Alsop thought, would prove vital on the ground in France. Plus, Alsop understood that Thouville’s mastery of French idiom and culture, especially his grasp of the internecine politics between Gaullist and Communist Resistance cells, would be a big asset.

He was given a pseudonym by Allied officials to protect his wife and children in case he was captured. The Gestapo was notorious for carrying our reprisals against the families of French soldiers who dared to continue the fight despite France’s surrender in June 1940.

*

Norman “Dick” Franklin’s middle-class New Jersey upbringing was far removed from Stewart Alsop’s New England Brahmin background. Franklin was sharp-witted and adept with his hands, which is how he qualified for radio technician.

The bespectacled Franklin also had retained enough high school French to respond “oui” when asked if he was competent in the language. Unbeknownst to Franklin, at that moment he was being quizzed about his credentials to serve in the OSS’s super-secret Jedburgh program, then just getting underway. Franklin was a quick learner – a “whiz” at Morse code, Alsop recalled.

Courtesy of the OSS, Franklin mastered his commando skills at a variety of stateside training sites, among them the converted fairways of Congressional Country Club outside Washington, D.C., and a camp tucked astride western Maryland’s Catoctin Mountain near Shangri-La, FDR’s presidential retreat. Today, it’s called Camp David.

Like so many WWII servicemen, Franklin got married before being shipped out for combat duty. In his unpublished book, he wrote amusingly of the opportunities he had in France to enjoy the carnal freedoms triggered by La Liberación – but claims to have resisted the temptation.

*

By now, dawn wasn’t far off. Thouville and his Gazogene men drove north, combing back roads for Alsop while calling out, “Stewww-aaarrrt!!” According to Franklin’s account, they had no luck.

Worried that Alsop had been nabbed or shot, in Franklin’s recollection Thouville returned to the farmhouse, where a bash the ALEXANDER team later described as “lucullan” was still going strong. Wine and huzzahs continued to flow freely; Franklin remembered one “incomprehensible” toast after another being made to the United States of America and the imminent defeat of the Boche.

The Resistance leaders told Franklin and Thouville that they’d send another Gazogene crew out to search for Alsop while the Jeds rested. By now, the sun was peeking over the horizon, putting their leader into even deeper jeopardy.

Alsop had spent the bulk of the early morning skulking from bush to bush in what he thought was the direction the plane had continued flying, hoping to recognize a landmark or bump into a friendly farmer. As dawn approached, he found a road and concealed himself in some ferns, planning to hail a passerby if one happened along.

A while later, Alsop watched from his hiding spot as a truck slowed down. In Alsop’s memory, he faintly heard his first name being called out by someone with a French accent. He remembered thinking that it was one of two scenarios: either the Gestapo was ruthlessly efficient and had already learned the name of the Jedburgh team leader who was invading its turf – or that Thouville had somehow contacted the local Resistance and that these people were trying to rescue him.

Fortunately for Alsop, it was the latter. In Alsop’s recollection, Thouville was with the Resistance posse that early morning and helped pull him out of the woods. Franklin’s memory was that Thouville was still at the farmhouse. Either way, Alsop was surprised to see that his rescuers were wearing armbands. And he recalled being stupefied by the peculiar-looking vehicle they were driving. Once ensconced in the truck, he was delighted to learn that he was being taken to a rendezvous with his team and that a hearty meal would be served. He was famished.

While Alsop was being retrieved, one of the women at the farmhouse presented Franklin with a gift – a patch of his parachute. She was planning to use the rest of Franklin’s chute to sew clothes for Resistance families and to make U.S. and French flags, to be brandished as they routed the Germans.

Even though the sun was now up, Alsop arrived at the hideaway to plenty of “sourish wine,” as he later put it, and drunken revelry.

Alors,” Thouville needled him, nodding toward some comely female Maquisards. “Tu aimes la France?

Oui,” Alsop smirked back. “J’aime la France beaucoup.”

Franklin pulled Alsop aside and gave his boss the bad news about the radio. Not only was the transmitter badly dented, but its output tube had been damaged. The radioman wasn’t sure it could be fixed.

For all three Jeds, the lasting impression of those first few days in Occupied France was the way the Maquis operated with impunity. The Jeds had been briefed at Milton Hall that the Germans had control over most of the major towns in southwest-central France but their grip on smaller villages and the countryside had begun to wane but was still formidable.

The truth was that Team ALEXANDER’s new friends could move from village to forest hideout without having to be furtive. It was only when they crossed theRoute Nationaleor ventured through one of the larger crossroad towns that they had to exercise caution. It took Allied intelligence weeks before they understood that, in most places, theMaquis’vehicles could travel at night with headlights on – and that additional supplies of gasoline would go a long way toward expelling the Germans from the heart of France.

After a few hours of sleep, the three ALEXANDER men borrowed bicycles to ride out to a high spot where they could test Franklin’s radio. When they got to the hilltop, Franklin, mortified, realized he’d forgotten his crystals. Without uttering a word, Lt. Alsop jumped on his bike and returned to the farmhouse. Alsop found the crystals and pedaled back to join his mates. Franklin expected “a good chewing out,” but Alsop never mentioned the incident, then or later.

To their surprise, the radio worked, at least for the moment. They got through to London HQ, but no message was sent in response.

They returned to the farmhouse, where they sat down with a British medical officer whose mission and identity were codenamed HAMLET. He had been secreted behind enemy lines for months.  With HAMLET pointing out enemy strongholds, Team ALEXANDER mapped out ways to work their way to the Creuse Department, the home of their targeted Resistance partners, the BERGAMOTTE cell.

The trio also met up with colleagues in Jedburgh Team LEE that day, two Frenchmen and an American commander named Charles E. Brown III. LEE had been parachuted in the previous week and was using the farmhouse as its base of operation. With HAMLET, a full complement of Maquisards, various SAS operatives, and not one but two Jedburgh teams suddenly en résidence, a remote farm in Haute-Vienne had the feel of a Hilton hotel.

The ALEXANDER men didn’t stay long. HAMLET introduced them to another British medical officer, known simply as “The Major,” who had also been hidden for months in south-central France. If Thouville was the epitome of a Frenchman, Franklin observed years later, then The Major was the embodiment of an upper crust Brit.

“[The Major] had the sort of face,” Alsop wrote decades later, “that only England could produce: Blue eyes, a thin nose, droopy blond moustache, and a ready chin, the whole ensemble expressing the sort of assured lassitude which can be nothing but English. To top it off, he wore a monocle.”

The Major and his monocle craved action. “Just ‘doctoring’ must have been a little too unexciting for him,” Franklin noted.

Perhaps too nonchalantly, The Major volunteered to serve as their guide, explaining that he had a Resistance “acquaintance” situated between Haute-Vienne and Limoges who could help steer ALEXANDER’s vehicle through dicey territory. To Franklin, it sounded like The Major was saying, in a quintessentially British way, “’Ought to be a bit of sport, what?’ sort of a thing.”

A flatbed Gazogene truck appeared out of nowhere. Alsop and his men watched, impressed, as the Maquis guys placed protective sandbags around the perimeter of the truck bed and mounted a Bren machine gun on the roof of the cab and another on its tail. Several of the SAS commandos had been wounded; they were placed on stretchers behind the sandbags.

Well after dark, they bade farewell to their farmhouse friends and set off in the truck. The Major drove, with Alsop and Thouville also jammed into the cab. Franklin joined the wounded men in lying flat in the back, concealed by the sandbags. Just in case, everyone kept their weapons at the ready, pointed in every direction.

A little way into the trek they approached a sizeable village. The Major admitted he wasn’t sure which route to take. He took the chance, Franklin remembered, of knocking on the door of a large house. An angry voice yelled from an upstairs window that he was the mayor of the town and “What the blankety-blank hell did we want in the middle of the blankety-blank night?!”

Once The Major explained the situation, the mayor pointed to the correct street and urged them to be quick: there were a lot of Sales Boches (“Dirty Germans”) in the middle of town.

The Major climbed back into the cab and gunned it. Just as they cleared the town square, heavy gunfire erupted. Nasty red tracers flashed across their tail, but Alsop ordered the crew not to return fire. After some anxious moments, they breathed easier when the Germans chose not to pursue them.

Every now and then they had to stop to reheat the oven with charcoal. But their headlights stayed on as they drove through miles of forestland. Whenever they approached a junction, The Major stopped to send a scout forward to ensure that there weren’t any Sales Boches hidden around the next bend.

The Major’s intelligence source and his knowledge of the area’s backroads proved useful. They traveled all night; just before daybreak, they found the BERGAMOTTE camp hidden on the outskirts of Bourganeuf. The Maquisards were bivouacked beneath a series of repurposed Allied silk parachute tents” that stretched from tree to tree.

 

Once they sat down with the BERGAMOTTE leadership, it was clear that the big bosses in London had been right and wrong: Right that the cell had been under repeated enemy assaults, but wrong that they’d been compromised by the Gestapo. A festive party commenced, with surprisingly good food and enough red wine to cause Franklin to repair to the woods.

The next day Alsop sent Franklin off on a reconnaissance mission to the Route Nationale in the company of several Maquisards. They were under strict orders not to fire their weapons for fear they’d betray BERGAMOTTE’s forest hideout. At one point the recon party squirreled themselves into some ferns along the roadway as one German convoy after another motored past.

When Franklin returned to camp and reported his close calls, the Jed commander realized that he’s asked Franklin to take an unacceptable risk. A Jedburgh radioman was too valuable to send on such precarious missions. Alsop never again asked Franklin to go on risky recon.

That night, under the parachute canopy, the ALEXANDER guys and everyone else were awakened by a burst of gunfire. They scrambled for their weapons, fearing that the camp was being overrun by enemy troops. But it turned out that a young Maquis sentry had fallen asleep on guard duty; he accidentally dropped his chin onto the trigger of a Sten gun. Nobody got hurt

Alsop worried that if they attempted to engage Franklin’s radio around the camp, it might tip off the Germans’ direction-finding radio trucks, which had for four years roamed Occupied Europe, ready to pounce on any Resistance cell tapping the airwaves. Each night around midnight, the team would wander toward high ground to send their messages to London. Despite repeated contacts, there were still no specific instructions from their superiors.

The team quickly sensed that BERGAMOTTE was in decent shape and didn’t need their special services. The Creuse Resistance leaders urged them to help the Maquis contingent in the Dordogne Department, some 80 kilometers to the southwest. BERGAMOTTE’s intelligence suggested that the Dordogne Resistance was camping near the village of Thieviers and supposedly having trouble getting untracked.

To get to Thieviers, Team ALEXANDER would again have to traverse part of the Haute-Vienne. At that point, they’d been underground in France for little more than a week but had already crept through practically every region of the department.

They were assigned a guide who pulled up in a beat-up Citroën that ran on alcohol – not gasoline or charcoal. Audaciously flying from its hood were French and American flags.

Off they chugged to find the Dordogne sect of the FFI, the Forces Francaise de L’Interieure. The FFI, a term that encompasses most of the French Resistance forces in WWII, fought with such reckless ferocity that Allied soldiers nicknamed them “Foolish French Idiots.”

Their guide knew all the remote roads through the woods and could pinpoint enemy camps; given all the Germans around, he had no choice but to meander down one dirt path after another in the creek-swollen Plateau de Millevaches.

Alsop watched, amazed, as the guide inched the Citroën up to safe houses and camouflaged hideaways to get the latest intelligence on the location of the Germans and their Milicien cohorts. The guide smartly avoided all the potential ambush sites as they zigged and zagged. At the end of day two, the ALEXANDER men arrived at a ramshackle chateau about halfway on their roundabout route to Thieviers; they were told that they could use the property as their temporary base.

At the estate, Alsop and company shared quarters for a day with a Communist Maquis outfit that was part of the FTP, the Franc Tireurs Partisan. Jeds heading to France had been briefed about the erratic behavior of certain left-wing Resistance cells. Many Communist guerillas flatly refused to cooperate with the FFI or take instructions from Allied intelligence. Others fought but couldn’t always be trusted.

When the FTP guerillas at the chateau insisted on providing a round-the-clock bodyguard for Franklin and his radio, it aroused suspicions. The Communists clearly wanted to know what messages ALEXANDER was sending to London – and what information, if any, it was getting in return. Franklin was careful to keep the FTP fighters out of earshot that afternoon when he cranked up the radio.

After finishing his transmission on a hilltop a couple of miles from the chateau, Franklin was surprised to see an enemy plane buzzing overhead. It was a Doënier flying boat, a French relic from the ‘20s that flew so low that Franklin got a good look at its crew. The plane was a surveillance craft that bore a resemblance to Howard Hughes’ “Spruce Goose” of yore. To Franklin’s eye, the Doënier didn’t appear to have any machine guns or bombs aboard.

Still, the plane’s presence spooked Alsop and his team. It may have meant the Germans had zeroed in on ALEXANDER’s radio transmissions and were planning an attack. Alsop ordered his mates to pack up and shift to a different FFI-friendly home. It was the first of ALEXANDER’s many moves from chateau to chateau.

In the weeks to come, the trio only sporadically slept outdoors. When they bunked under a roof, it tended to be in a big country house, as Alsop enjoyed pointing out in the years to come. Some of the homes were chateaux fermes, working farms that had been abandoned or stripped bare; others were opulent mansions still occupied by gentleman farmers and wealthy families.

Some owners were patrons of the FFI, while others were sympathetic to the Milice but kept their political views quiet, at least in the presence of ALEXANDER and company. On occasion the owners asked Alsop for reimbursement; he happily obliged, tapping the stash he brought with him from London. Others refused payment, telling Alsop they were honored to help and encouraging him to use his cash elsewhere. Team ALEXANDER christened their indoor accommodations “motels.”

One of the motels they stayed in on their way to Dordogne was a dilapidated joint that lacked running water or reliable electricity. The team was forced to bathe in a nearby creek and use a garden outhouse that was separated from the main home by a six-foot-high steel picket fence.

Franklin was using the privy late one August evening when the rat-a-tat-tat of small weapons fire suddenly erupted from the other side of the property. The radioman cursed at himself for leaving his rifle and sidearm in the big house. Holding his still-unzipped pants with one hand, he vaulted over the fence and barged into the house, which was in pandemonium.

As Franklin scrambled to corral his radio, Maquisards were yelling that there were Boche in trucks attacking from a road to the west. He quickly huddled with Alsop and Thouville. They agreed that Franklin and his wireless should run east, away from the gunfire, which is what Franklin did in the company of a local farmhand who doubled as a Resistance fighter.

Franklin carried the wireless while his companion grabbed Franklin’s M-1; the two of them ran full-tilt in pitch dark for a half-mile or more, through an apple orchard and up the side of a wooded hill before they dared take a breather. The firing receded, then stopped. Things stayed quiet.

Just as they began to relax, an Allied bombing raid could be heard, softly at first, then much louder and closer. The bombers were pounding an area immediately to the east – exactly where Franklin and his aide had been heading.

Even after the bombing waned, they continued to lie still, worried that Germans might be combing through the woods to catch stragglers. Finally, they made their way back toward the house, “weapons at the ready,” Franklin remembered.

It turned out to be a long and messy false alarm. Team ALEXANDER never got the complete lowdown, but apparently Maquis sentries had fired on an enemy truck that had, in all probability, blundered down the dead-end road to the chateau. The Boche had returned fire, at least for a time, as the truck reversed course. Maquisards, as was their wont, may have expended considerable energy and ammunition firing at phantom soldiers and vehicles.

Alsop and Thouville spent the bulk of the night at the base of the chateau, their rifles cocked westward.

The Jeds again huddled when Franklin returned. There was no rest for the weary. Alsop insisted that they resume the push toward Dordogne right away.  

 

    *

Just before sunup, Team ALEXANDER moved out in a Gazogene, cautiously, because they were using the same road down which the Germans had retreated a few hours before. Progress was slow. They had to probe their way through heavily forested areas.

Each time they came to a bend or a crossroads, they got out to conduct reconnaissance to make sure there weren’t any hostile forces around. To tide them over, they had packed cheese sandwiches and wine; as they slurped le vin, they were careful not to let the bottle top smash their teeth as the car jostled around.

At one point, they came across a tree that had been deliberately chopped down by the Germans to set the stage for an ambush. But no guerillas or soldiers were evident. Not far from the felled tree, they went looking for a Maquis ally whose hut was hidden in the woods. But when they got there, there was no sign of him; the shed was riddled with bullet holes, but they didn’t find any traces of blood. Maybe the Maquisard had eluded the ambush.

On the same trip, they ran into a German tank on a windy road along a hillside. The tank was able to get off only one shot; it missed, badly. Their Gazogene found cover and slipped up the hill. The tank did not pursue them.

Franklin’s radio gave up the ghost after another few days. Whenever they encountered another Resistance cell, they’d ask if a radio were available. Miraculously, one was – an old B-2 set that must have been supplied by the SOE earlier in the war. Just as miraculously, it still worked.

After three or four days of playing cat-and-mouse on the roads of south-central France, Team ALEXANDER arrived in Dordogne along the Brive-Périgeaux corridor in the department’s northern region.

Alsop had been advised by sources along the way that the Dordogne Resistance cell would be in the woods east of Brive. But when the ALEXANDER trio arrived, they learned that the Maquis men were in the middle of assaulting the German garrison in Périgeaux, some 25 kilometers northwest.

They hustled back onto the road, expecting at any moment to bump into pissed-off Wehrmacht grenadiers or weary FFI stragglers. Instead, they motored unimpeded into Périgeaux. The firefight, brief but bloody, had ended hours earlier. After abandoning the village, most of the Germans had fled north and west, toward the safety of their Atlantic coastal bases.

Team ALEXANDER joined a raucous liberation party in the town square fronting a 300-year-old cathedral. People were weeping with joy, celebrating the end of four years of Nazi oppression. Within minutes, Alsop, Thouville, and Franklin found themselves seated in the back of a brasserie, being plied with wine and beer – and getting smothered with hugs and kisses.

There they joined in saluting the man who had orchestrated the German ouster from Périgeaux. He was the most formidable Resistance leader they would encounter. His nom de guerre was “RAC,” a colloquial French acronym that meant, Franklin was told, something on the order of “feisty Scottish dog.”

RAC was the commandant of what was called in that part of Occupied France the AS, the Armée Secreté. His reputation was so fierce that the local Resistance cell was named in his honor, La Brigade du RAC.

RAC was small in stature but large in grit. He was quiet, “not given to talk,” Alsop remembered. The Frenchman’s eyes were cold and expressionless, like a cat’s, Alsop thought.

Early in the war, as a regular officer in the French army, he was captured after the Germans overran France, but managed to escape to Alsace-Lorraine. Not long after, he was recaptured by the Gestapo but again slipped away, this time to the heartland of France, where he organized his own Resistance brigade and quickly became the Germans’ Bête Noire.

Alsop would dub him Le Chat (“The Cat”); years later he called RAC the most courageous man he’d ever known. When Team ALEXANDER first met them, the Brigade RAC consisted of about 600 men. When ALEXANDER departed a few weeks later, the brigade had nearly doubled in size and was gaining new recruits every day. RAC was “hero-worshiped” everywhere he went, Alsop observed.

Discipline in the Maquis “was a matter of the force of human personality,” Alsop wrote in a Saturday Evening Post essay a quarter-century later. “Some Resistance groups, because that force was lacking, disintegrated. Not the Brigade RAC.”

RAC and his charges that afternoon had just sent the hated enemy packing; he and his guerilla fighters were being loudly fêted.

Profane shrieking suddenly erupted in the square. RAC and the Jeds hustled outside to check on the disturbance. Several hundred German prisoners were being paraded in front of the cathedral. Villagers were lining up to hiss and spit at them.

“Every (enemy) face had the same gray pallor,” Alsop recalled. From there, ALEXANDER was told, they would be taken to the railway yard where they would be lined up against boxcars and executed.

Alsop immediately voiced opposition. These were prisoners-of-war and should be treated as such, Alsop told RAC. It was clear from their appearance that the Germans were either too old, too young, or too infirm to be frontline soldiers, the American argued.

It was at that moment that “we were then further enlightened about the character of the enemy,” Franklin recollected.

A day or two before, the Maquis had entered nearby Saint-Martin-de-Pallières, a village that the Germans had just deserted. Hanging from the balcony of virtually every house were murdered townspeople, children among them. They’d been slaughtered because the local Resistance had been so effective in harassing the enemy.

The Jed team did not know whether to believe the massacre story and were never able to corroborate it. “But the point was that the populace believed it and they were demanding an eye-for-an-eye,” Franklin wrote. Lord knows there were enough true stories of Nazi atrocities; this one sounded credible to the Jeds.

Still, Thouville and Franklin lent their support to Alsop. The aging men and young kids being jeered were hardly the type to perpetrate war crimes, they echoed.

RAC and his compadres wouldn’t budge. Vengeance had to be carried out; their countrymen were demanding it.

Alsop firmly replied that the U.S. flag would have nothing to do with mass shootings. Team ALEXANDER packed up their equipment, climbed back into the Citroën, and headed toward Brive.

“Nothing that Stewart Alsop ever did made me more proud of him than that,” Franklin recounted in his memoirs. “Though the prospect of the massacre made me feel ill, I must say that I would probably not have thought enough about it, or taken such a stand, or carried the matter so far, had not Alsop led the way. . . I was also proud of Thouville. Though I cannot speak for what his thoughts may have been, his words and actions were entirely ALEXANDRIAN.”

The team never found out if the German stragglers had indeed been executed in Périgeaux. They chose not to ask questions for fear that members of the RAC Brigade or their ardent supporters might take offense. Instead, the three Jeds recognized the value of cultivating a close working relationship with RAC and his lieutenants. RAC commanded near-universal obeisance from the local populace.

The exception, of course, were the Communist guerillas in the FTP. Alsop, as he had been instructed at Milton Hall, attempted to broker a rapprochement between RAC and the FTP. He didn’t get far. The FTP at that point in the war was obsessed with settling old scores and seizing as much private property as they could from despised ploutocrates.

“Louis, the FTP leader, ‘yessed’ us to death but when it came time to act, FTP participation was minimal or nonexistent,” Franklin remembered.

RAC and Alsop agreed that their little army’s next objective should be the liberation of Angoulême, a town some 85 kilometers northwest of Périgeaux that straddled a key roadway to the enemy’s coastal garrisons. As they eyeballed a map, RAC told Alsop that it would take several days by car for his brigade to circumnavigate all the German troops along the way. But RAC knew of some friendly chateaux fermes where they could bivouac enroute.

Early in their trek to Angoulême, ALEXANDER ran into the remnants of yet another Jedburgh team, MARK, at a country home. They learned that their friend and colleague, Lieutenant Lou Goddard of the MARK team, had been killed a few days earlier when his parachute’s static line had faltered.

Just outside Angoulême, Alsop ordered the ALEXANDER team’s car to slow down as they passed a chateau near the road. A bunch of armed FTP fighters were milling about, looking menacing. Alsop and Thouville asked for a briefing and were told that the owner of the chateau had collaborated with the enemy; they planned to execute him on the spot.

Alsop and Thouville started pressing the FTP guerillas to produce evidence that the owner was in league with the Germans. Whatever they cited must have been weak; after ALEXANDER began challenging them, the Communist guerillas “skedaddled,” Franklin recalled.  

The owner turned out to be Manouche, the Comte de Balincourt, a member of one of southwest France’s most prominent families. Had ALEXANDER not intervened, Manouche may well have been shot and his property confiscated. The grateful Manouche invited ALEXANDER to use his home as its base of operation for the assault on Angoulême.

Alsop and Thouville again ordered Franklin to stay at the house to protect the B-2. Off the two lieutenants went to help RAC plan and execute the attack. Soon enough, Franklin heard the retort of sharp gun- and mortar-fire. It sounded nasty, but in truth the Germans did not put up much of a fight before retiring toward the coast.

La Brigade du RAC benefited from a diabolical scheme that was apparently hatched in concert with clerics from the local abbey. Weeks earlier, a cache of weapons had been buried in Angoulême’s cemetery. The guns had been hidden in caskets and slipped past the Germans during funerals, then dug up by villagers when RAC’s guerillas were poised to attack. The cemetery weapons helped rout the enemy.

Thouville and Alsop watched, mesmerized, as a company of 300 Italian soldiers stationed on the periphery of town surrendered en masse, giving up all their weapons, including a coveted 20-millimeter cannon that RAC and his men could put to good use.

Manouche de Balincourt and Thouville became fast friends. For the entirety of ALEXANDER’s three-week stay in Dordogne, the Manouche made himself available to Thouville and company. He served as chauffeur, courier, chef, and scavenger, all the more remarkable since he spoke next-to-no English.

While they were bunking at the Manouche’s chateau, ALEXANDER finally received some acknowledgment from London – but it was in French, in response to a message Thouville had crafted. Their Jedburgh superiors conceded they didn’t have the “foggiest” notion as to ALEXANDER’s whereabouts or what they’d be up to – or that the team was no longer attached to BERGAMOTTE.

It flummoxed Alsop that London’s communications had been so slapdash. But once ALEXANDER figured out that there was a French speaker plugged into the other end of the radio, Alsop ordered all future messaging be done en Française. It worked – at least to a degree.

The Jedburgh high command continued to frustrate ALEXANDER; the team was incredulous that London was so sluggish in responding to their requests for additional arms and gasoline to be parachuted into Dordogne. But at least they were now getting some feedback. Since Franklin’s command of French still left something to be desired, Thouville often wrote out a script.  

Weeks later, when Alsop was recalled (briefly) to London, he had a heated confrontation with the British Jedburgh officer who was supposed to coordinating ALEXANDER’s radio liaison. Franklin claimed that Alsop threw a punch at the Brit, but details of the tête-à-tête do not appear in Alsop’s memoirs.

For the next few days, the only time Alsop, Thouville, and Franklin fired their weapons was while hunting for ducks along the River Charente, hoping that the Manouche’s kitchen staff would turn them into dinner. After they found an old double-barrel shotgun collecting dust on the Manouche’s estate, they hunted rabbits, which were plentiful on the grounds. They also watched with dismay how farmhands produced the French delicacy foi gras.

While they had some down time, one of RAC’s followers told Franklin that the Germans were so desperate – and twisted – that they had begun parachuting soldiers disguised as priests behind Allied lines in France. A group of faux clerics had been apprehended because they were wearing jackboots underneath their monastic robes, Franklin was told. Other camouflaged German paratroopers had been more effective in infiltrating Allied areas, RAC’s lieutenant claimed.

“None of it seemed a very likely story at the time,” Franklin wrote years later. “I thought the Maquis was spinning a yarn or seeing ghosts.” But that was just weeks before the depth of Nazi depravity was exposed in the Battle of the Bulge. In the bedlam of the Ardennes Forest, the Germans unleashed assassination squads dressed as American G.I.s that inflicted horrific casualties. Before he left Angoulême for good, the RAC member gave Franklin a German Lugar pistol that purportedly had been taken off one of the priest-paratroopers.

The Germans that had been stationed in the Angoulême area, meanwhile, had taken refuge in their big bases near the ports of Royan and La Rochelle. Keeping their distance, the RAC Brigade and Team ALEXANDER holed up in a small riverside chateau outside Saintes and recalibrated their strategy.

RAC’s next objective was to expel enemy soldiers and sycophants from the town of Cognac, roughly halfway to the sea from Dordogne Nord. He asked ALEXANDER to help him plan and execute the assault. Again, the Jed trio found a chateaux ferme outside town. Thouville and Alsop helped themselves to copious amounts of the famous brandy that bore the town’s name; Franklin, not surprisingly, refrained.

At one point, the locals treated them to 140-year-old cognac that had supposedly been served at Napoleon’s coronation. To be diplomatic, Franklin took a couple of sips and could barely keep it down. Thouville and Alsop, on the other hand, imbibed freely. No one got drunk, but there was much knee-slapping, Franklin remembered.

Since at that point they were using a car fueled by alcohol, the trio actually poured “cheap” cognac into the gas tank!

Thouville invited his younger brother, Philippe de la Tousche, nicknamed “Philou,” to join them along the Charente. Enemy surveillance had deteriorated so badly at that point that all Thouville had to do to contact his brother was pick up a telephone.

Philou had no trouble finding their hideout. He was slender and handsome, like his older brother, but had no military training. Philou, therefore, was of little use in ambushes or sabotage missions, so RAC and Alsop assigned him to be Franklin’s go-fer.

The enemy was dug in so deep in Royan and La Rochelle that any direct assault would be foolhardy, RAC concluded. For several days running, Alsop had Franklin and Thouville send urgent radio messages begging London to send gasoline, supplies, and weaponry to RAC and his Cognac-stationed warriors. But they received nothing, not even an explanation, Franklin remembered. By now, the Maquis had no shortage of Peugeots, Citroëns, and Renaults; what it lacked was gasoline.

The weather, moreover, was turning colder. ALEXANDER had arrived in France wearing summer uniforms; they needed overcoats and warmer clothing. If they couldn’t get supplies from London, they reasoned, maybe they could wangle them from the nearest Allied army.

So Touville and Alsop borrowed a Gazogene, a guide, and a couple of RAC’s men and traveled north of the Loire, dodging German patrols and Milliciens. After a couple of harrowing days, they bumped into the southwestern edge of the Allied advance from Normandy.

Wary G.I. sentries escorted Alsop and Thouville to their commanding officer. Their “strange” request was then relayed up the chain to a rear-echelon lieutenant colonel.

 Alsop, remembering his training as a King’s Royal Rifleman and momentarily forgetting that he was now in the U.S. Army, stamped his feet, stiffened his shoulders, brought the back of his right hand up to his forehead, and bellowed, “Lefftenant Alsop reporting, sir!”

Three decades later Alsop wrote in his delightfully piquant style, “The light colonel gave me a lynx-eyed look, taking in brother John’s ill-fitting and by this time bedraggled uniform. There had been reports of Germans being sent to France in imitation American unforms.”

“’Lootenant,’ he said, emphasizing the first syllable, ‘how come you got your bars the wrong way round?’”

“’Do I, sir? Sorry, sir,’ I said. What else was there to say?

“‘And how come you got your crossed rifles upside down?’

“’Sorry, sir,’ I said, nonplussed.

“The light colonel lifted his telephone and asked to speak to a counterintelligence unit.

“I had visions of being stood up against a wall, offered a last cigarette, and shot as a German spy.”

It took a few more calls, but counterintelligence confirmed Alsop’s bona fides as “one of those goddamn OSS screwballs!”

Despite the affirmation, Alsop and Thouville returned to Cognac empty-handed. It “violated policy,” they were told, for the U.S. Army to provide supplies or equipment to OSS commandos or Resistance cells without explicit authorization from above. The Army, moreover, didn’t have any extra winter clothing to share with Jed teams or Maquisards.

The lack of appropriate clothing would prove to be a significant factor in the slowdown of the Allies’ push into Germany, contributing to their struggles in the Battle of the Bulge that December and January. To stave off the cold, Franklin borrowed thick pants from a Frenchman and took to wearing multiple socks and a couple of shirts underneath his field jacket.

    *

Members of RAC’s brigade brought to ALEXANDER rumors about a German vengeance weapon that was supposedly being tested near the seaside town of Royan. The device was known as the V-4 or, Rheinbote missile, a potentially deadly antipersonnel weapon that upon detonation would kill troops while leaving buildings essentially intact – something of a non-nuclear precursor to the neutron bomb of two generations later.

RAC’s men had learned about the V-4 from Polish slave laborers who had escaped from an enemy base. Some of the Poles said they’d been forced to help the Germans run experiments with the weapon; they were worried it was getting close to deployment.

When Alsop and Thouville passed word of yet another Nazi Vergeltungswaffe terror weapon up the chain of command, they got the impression that Allied officials, then ducking V-1 and V-2 attacks in London, were unfamiliar with it. The bosses demanded verification, but it was virtually impossible for the RAC Brigade or ALEXANDER to infiltrate the German coastal defenses.

As an alternative, Allied intelligence wanted the leader of the Polish slave laborers interrogated in liberated Paris and ordered ALEXANDER to bring him there. The man spoke little to no French and no German or English whatsoever, so he had to be questioned by a Polish speaker. Which meant that in late October ALEXANDER had no choice but to undertake another perilous cross-country trek through parts of France still occupied by the enemy. They borrowed a civilian car from RAC’s fleet and pressed Thouville’s brother Philou into serving as driver.

A couple of weeks earlier when Alsop and Thouville had traveled north of the River Loire seeking supplies, they were told there were no passable bridges. They ended up cadging a ride across the river with a military ferry.

In the interim, however, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had performed a miracle. Bombed-out bridges had been restored and temporary spans erected to handle jeeps, trucks, and tanks. When ALEXANDER and company arrived on the southern bank of the Loire at Tours, they were waved onto a temporary structure. But when they reached the opposite side, military policemen ground them to a halt.

The group’s decidedly “un-G.I.” appearance rankled Army MPs. After all, Alsop and his men were wearing a mishmash of uniforms and civilian garb, were driving a bizarre-looking civilian vehicle, had two guys in their party who didn’t speak any English (one of whom was Polish, no less!), and lacked written orders or credentials.

“They suspected we were German spies, but, just in case, they were afraid to throw us in a stockade,” Franklin recalled.

Instead, ALEXANDER was told to hang out on the north bank of the Loire for a couple of days until the Army could verify their claims. Along with scores of other Allied military personnel, they checked into a hotel that turned out to have a first-rate restaurant, a development that delighted Alsop and Thouville, both of whom had gold coins and leftover francs burning holes in their pockets.

Alsop put Franklin in charge of the Pole while they cooled their heels in Tours. It was easy duty for the radioman; for the first time in years, the Pole was sleeping in a comfortable bed and eating decent food; he was hardly a flight risk! Still, Franklin slept in the same room and never let the Pole out of his sight.

It took two-and-a-half days to iron out the Army red tape, but ALEXANDER was finally told to continue their journey to Paris. Once they completed the 250-kilometer drive, they dropped off the Pole for his V-4 interrogation – and never saw him again. They had no idea of what came of his allegations or whether Allied intelligence ever acted on them.

To this day, the V-4 remains shrouded in mystery, the subject of wild conjecture. Some scholars question whether it ever got beyond the planning or testing stages; others claim the Germans attempted to deploy it against Allied infantry in the siege at Antwerp in late ’44.

Whatever the reality, the V-4 came nowhere close to inflicting the damage wrought by its infamous cousins, the V-1 and V-2.

  *

Dick Franklin fell in love with Paris during his extended stay in the war’s last fall and winter. He took in the can-can shows at Moulin Rouge, cultivated a taste for French cuisine, explored Rive Gauche and Montmartre (where he stayed in a flat), and most of the time didn’t need to worry about whether his radio was working.

In early November ‘44, OSS ordered Franklin to return to the Cognac area to bring the RAC Brigade and other Resistance fighters up to speed with the latest radio equipment. Philou Thouville agreed to transport Franklin southwest in a motorcycle with a sidecar. A few kilometers west of Versailles in a village called Trappe, the pair survived a violent collision with an Army truck.

Both were hospitalized; Philou with a broken leg, Franklin with head and internal injuries. It took several days for word of their infirmity to reach Alsop. He rushed to the hospital and was told the military had issued an incorrect cable to Franklin’s wife Susie saying that Franklin had been killed. It was almost impossible for a G.I. in France to send a telegram back home at that point in the war, but Alsop tapped his family connections and managed to convey this message to Susie: “DISREGARD PREVIOUS CABLE. FRANKLIN FOUND. NOT DEAD. ALSOP.”

Alas, Susie had not received the original cable, so Alsop’s telegram caused confusion and no small degree of anguish. Suspicious FBI agents knocked on Susie’s door, wondering what the coded word “ALSOP” meant. Since censorship rules prevented her husband from identifying his special ops boss by name in his letters, Susie had no idea where “ALSOP” came from. After a lengthy interrogation, the FBI concluded that Susie and her mysterious cohort did not represent a threat to national security.

Franklin recovered in mid-November. ALEXANDER was sent to maritime France for one final liaison mission with the Resistance. Outside the coastal village of Les Sable d’Olonne, they were thrilled to – finally! – witness an ALEXANDER-ordered supply drop hit the ground. The parachute drop included gasoline and weapons for the Maqui, as well as British Army Issue winter clothing. Franklin at last got the jacket and scarf he’d been requesting for weeks on end.

With most of the enemy racing for the border, the Jed trio’s shooting war was pretty much over as winter approached. Alsop was ordered to London in mid-fall ’44, where he assessed the Maquis’ strengths for his OSS/SOE/Jed superiors and (again?) may have tongue-lashed ALEXANDER’s communications liaison. He was then parachuted back into southwestern France for a short-lived reunion with RAC and other Resistance leaders. But by then most Maquis organizations were heavily armed and self-sufficient.

Alsop no longer needed to bounce from farmhouse to forest hideout providing a helping hand as he had that summer and early fall. Soon enough, he rejoined his team back in Paris; he and Franklin somehow managed to scare up a turkey to celebrate a belated Thanksgiving. After a couple more weeks counseling SHAEF on the efficacy of certain French Resistance cells and Jedburgh operations, Alsop flew back to London to continue his OSS duties.

*

Tish had suffered a miscarriage in late summer but Alsop’s brief visit to London that fall had resulted in a second pregnancy. The couple had already made plans for Tish to travel across the ocean solo, move in with Stewart’s sister and brother-in-law in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, D.C. The only member of the Alsop family that Tish had met at that point was Stewart’s younger brother John, while he was in training with the Jeds.

Still a teenager, Tish was uprooting herself to live in a strange land surrounded by strangers. It could not have been easy, even for someone of Tish’s moxie.

*

There were Maquis activities in the winter and spring of ’45 aimed at hounding the retreating Germans and making life miserable for the enemy troops still holed up at the U-boat pens and Kriegsmarine bases on France’s Atlantic coast. But most Jeds were sent to the sidelines, recalled to Britain, or dispatched to the Pacific or Chinese-Burma-India theaters, among them John Alsop.

An exception was Richard Thouville. Thouville reentered the French Army in early ’45 but was sent back to the heartland to continue working with RAC. He stayed with RAC’s brigade almost until V-E Day in May of ’45 and continued to serve in the French Army after the war. He returned to his wife and children and stayed in touch with Alsop and Franklin over the years, exchanging letters and attending Jedburgh reunions in Europe and the U.S.

Franklin was recruited that winter by a special ops group examining the feasibility of sending paratroopers into Nazi-held territories to rescue Allied prisoners-of-war. There was great fear that POWs would be summarily executed as the Wehrmacht disintegrated and Allied troops penetrated deeper into the Reich. But Franklin and other convinced the brass that POW rescue missions – from the air – stood little chance of success. As it turned out, relatively few Allied prisoners were murdered in cold blood.

Eventually, Franklin returned to New Jersey and sought to take advantage of his expertise in intelligence and communications. In the 1950s, he accepted an offer to join the Central Intelligence Agency and stayed with the agency for the bulk of his career.

*

The pregnant Tish boarded a jam-packed freighter to travel across the Atlantic. It took her 19 days before the boat steamed past the Statue of Liberty. The Army and OSS acceded to Alsop’s request to join his wife in the States. Two weeks after Tish’s departure, Alsop got a berth on the Queen Elizabeth. Soon they were reunited, at first in New England, then in D.C.

As the decades went by, the Commandant Americain was good about staying in touch with his old KRRC and Jedburgh mates. In 1955, the Royal Couple attended a reception to honor the KRRC; Stewart and Tish traveled to London for the occasion and had their pictures taken with Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. Five years later, there was a New York reunion of the American, Canadian, and British KRRC alums. George Thomson, Ted Ellsworth, and Tom Braden all joined Alsop in a night of storytelling and merriment. There was also at least one trip to France to retrace ALEXANDER’s steps with the RAC Brigade.

In July of 1971, Alsop was taking out the trash at his country home in Maryland when he suddenly felt tired and nauseous. He sensed something was wrong and found himself muttering the same phrase he used 27 years earlier when he prematurely bailed out of a British warplane over Occupied France: “Face it, Alsop. You’re in trouble.”

He was. Alsop had contracted acute myeloblastic leukemia, a rare cancer of the blood‐producing marrow. After a three-year battle that produced a poignant memoir, Stay of Execution, Alsop succumbed. A few weeks earlier he had written, “A dying man needs to die as a sleepy man needs to sleep, and there comes a time when it is wrong, as well as useless, to resist.”

He was tragically young – barely 60 when the end came. At the time of his diagnosis, the two youngest of his six children were only four and 11. Tish was widowed at the tender age of 48.

Stewart Alsop remains, a half-century after his passing, a pivotal figure in postwar American journalism and foreign policy. Together with his older brother (and fellow columnist) Joe, he helped forge the Georgetown Set, the elite cadre of Washington opinion leaders who sought to reverse America’s traditional isolationism and harden the country’s resolve to wage and win the Cold War.

For good or ill, the Alsop brothers and their vaunted (and often feared) Sunday night dinner/salons with Cabinet officers, Members of Congress, and presidential wannabes shaped U.S. national security policy for two generations. Tish often served as a hostess at these gatherings, usually at her brother-in-law’s Georgetown townhouse.

The Alsop brothers were writing partners from 1945 to 1957; at its zenith, their column, “Matter of Fact,” appeared in nearly 150 U.S. newspapers. Twice awarded the Overseas Press Club medal for international reporting, the Alsops had a hard-and-fast rule: never to write about a country unless they had personally visited and gotten to know its leaders.

After he broke away from his brother, Stewart Alsop’s columns for the Saturday Evening Post and later his back-of-the-magazine essays for Newsweek were among the era’s most influential commentaries. Unlike his sibling, whose hardline views became increasingly shrill and combative, Stewart addressed weighty matters in a nuanced and almost wistful tone. He abhorred heated rhetoric and ideological rigidity, whether it came from the left or right.

When 1968’s Tet offensive exposed the frailty of America’s policy in Vietnam, Stewart eventually joined Walter Cronkite and other pundits in urging an end to U.S. combat involvement, pointing out the futility of sustaining an unpopular and ineffectual war. In contrast, the elder Alsop doubled down on his conviction that victory in Southeast Asia was just around the corner – bluster that, five-plus decades later, still clouds Joe’s legacy.

Throughout their careers, both brothers remained intimately connected to the intelligence communities of the U.S. and its allies – perhaps too intimately.

Five years before his death, Stewart Alsop wrote a piece for Newsweek entitled, “Yale Revisited.” In it, he deplored the contempt with which many college-age people treated the U.S. military and other institutions. But he also volunteered: “There's something going on here our generation will never understand.”

The “fraudulent” military draft system, he argued, coupled with the deceit that undercut our presence in Vietnam, had convinced certain young people that the American system was “a gigantic fraud.” Many journalists of Alsop’s era, including his own brother, were incapable of acknowledging such uncomfortable truths.

Tish, the onetime decoding specialist, had to endure a lifetime of Alsop-ian intrigue that permeated her homes in Georgetown, Cleveland Park, and backwoods Maryland. Her daughter Elizabeth, now a noted children’s author, chronicled her bumpy childhood and her mother’s struggles with depression and substance abuse in Daughter of Spies.

Tish Hankey Alsop lived for nearly four decades after Stewart passed. She died in 2012, the mother of six, grandmother of 15, now a great-grandmother many times over. It had been 70 years since she sparked their romance by telling her future husband that his military haircut made him look like a criminal.

In the final pages of Stay of Execution Alsop wrote of his OSS heroics, “There were a few moments of fear, exhaustion, and even some danger, but for the most part those weeks in the Maquis were a lot of fun – in some ways the best fun I’ve had in my life.”

He recalled that a few weeks after he returned to the U.S. in 1945, he got a package in the mail postmarked Paris. It turned out to be a “handsome scroll” awarding him a Croix de Guerre avec Palme, Signé, Charles de Gaulle.

His old pal Thouville had written the citation: “S’est trouvé de nombreuses fois dans les situations les plus périleuses d’où il s’est toujours sorte avec une calme edifant et une volunté galvanisante les énérgies de tous ceux qui l’entourait.”

“I cannot boast that my calm is edifying nor my will galvanizing, but my situation is undoubtedly again a bit perilous,” Alsop wrote in his self-effacing way as the end approached.

“I came out of that peculiar experience all in one piece, and maybe I will again. Even if my stay of execution turns out to be a short one, I have reason to be grateful, for a happy marriage and a reasonably long, amusing, and interesting life.”

                                                                    # # #

Timothy M. Gay is the Pulitzer-nominated author of two books on World War II, two books on baseball history, and a recent biography of golfer Rory McIlroy. He has written previous WWII-related articles for the Daily Beast, USA Today, and many other publications.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones

William Speakman stands as one of the most striking examples of individual courage in the Korean War, a conflict often overshadowed by the Second World War and the later trauma of Vietnam, yet one that produced acts of gallantry no less extraordinary. His Victoria Cross was earned during the bitter fighting of the Second Battle of Maryang-san in November 1951, when United Nations forces were locked in a relentless struggle against repeated and determined assaults by Chinese troops. Speakman's actions—charging forward under heavy fire with his pockets stuffed full of grenades—were not only physically daring but psychologically decisive, galvanizing exhausted comrades at a moment when pressure, cold, and fear threatened to overwhelm them.

Terry Bailey explains.

William Speakman-Pitt, Victoria Cross.

Born in 1927 in Altrincham, Cheshire, William Speakman grew up in a Britain shaped by economic hardship and looming global instability. His early life was unremarkable in the way that many working-class childhoods of the interwar years were, marked by austerity, discipline, and the formative experience of the Second World War on the home front. Air raids, rationing, and the omnipresence of uniformed men left a deep impression on an entire generation, instilling both resilience and a familiarity with sacrifice. Nothing in Speakman's youth suggested that he would one day perform an act of heroism that would be recognized at the highest level, yet his background fostered the quiet toughness and sense of duty that later defined his conduct.

In the post-war years, as Britain struggled to redefine itself amid imperial decline and economic strain, military service remained a steady path for many young men. Speakman enlisted in the army and joined the King's Own Scottish Borderers, a regiment with a long and distinguished history. For Speakman, as for countless others, the army offered structure, camaraderie, and purpose. By the time he was deployed to the Far East, he was a private soldier rather than an officer or senior non-commissioned leader, a fact that would later make his actions all the more remarkable. His courage was not the product of rank or expectation, but of individual resolve under extreme circumstances.

The Korean War began in June 1950 when North Korean forces crossed the 38th parallel and launched a surprise invasion of South Korea. The rapid collapse of South Korean defenses prompted a United Nations response, spearheaded by the United States but supported by forces from across the Commonwealth and beyond. British troops, including the King's Own Scottish Borderers, soon found themselves fighting in a conflict that was as politically complex as it was militarily brutal. The initial phase of the war was highly mobile, with dramatic advances and retreats, but this fluidity changed dramatically following the intervention of Chinese "People's Volunteer Army" forces late in 1950.

The Chinese entry transformed the war. Mass infantry attacks, often conducted at night and supported by mortars and bugle calls, pushed UN forces back and shattered any illusion of a quick victory. By 1951 the conflict had settled into a grinding stalemate, with both sides contesting rugged hills and ridgelines across central Korea. These features, often barren, steep, and exposed, dominated the surrounding terrain and supply routes, making them tactically invaluable and fiercely contested. Battles were fought not for sweeping territorial gains, but for individual hills whose names were often little more than map references, yet whose possession could decide the fate of an entire sector.

The Second Battle of Maryang-san formed part of this wider struggle for dominance in the hills north of the Imjin River. Maryang-san was not a single peak but a complex of interconnected heights, heavily fortified by Chinese troops who had dug deep defensive positions into the rocky ground. The King's Own Scottish Borderers were tasked with holding these positions against determined counterattacks once they had been taken. The conditions were appalling: freezing temperatures sapped strength and concentration, while constant shelling and small-arms fire left little opportunity for rest. Sleep was scarce, nerves were frayed, and the line between endurance and collapse grew increasingly thin.

On the 4th of November 1951, Chinese forces launched a renewed assault against positions held by Speakman's platoon. Attacking in strength and using the cover of broken ground, they pressed forward with the clear intention of overwhelming the defenders. It was during this critical moment that William Speakman's extraordinary courage came to the fore. Recognizing that the attackers were closing in and that defensive fire alone might not be enough, Speakman volunteered to carry grenades forward to the most threatened areas. Stuffing his pockets with as many grenades as he could carry, he moved out into the open, fully exposed to enemy fire.

From forward positions, Speakman hurled grenade after grenade into the advancing Chinese troops, disrupting their formations and forcing them to take cover. Each throw required him to stand, aim, and expose himself anew to small-arms and mortar fire. The physical danger was immense, but so too was the psychological strain. Yet Speakman persisted, returning to resupply and then advancing again as the pressure mounted. His actions bought precious time for his platoon, blunting the momentum of the attack at a moment when it threatened to break through.

What truly set Speakman apart was not a single moment of reckless bravery, but his repeated willingness to do it again. When another Chinese attack developed from a different direction, he once more filled his pockets with grenades and advanced alone. Again he pelted the enemy at close range, his conspicuous courage visible to all around him. Inspired by his example, other soldiers followed him forward, strengthening the defense and restoring confidence along the line. In an environment where fear and exhaustion could so easily paralyze action, Speakman's initiative transformed the psychological balance of the fight.

The official citation for William Speakman's Victoria Cross captured both the physical and moral dimensions of his conduct. It highlighted not only his gallantry under fire, but also the inspirational effect his actions had on those around him. He had no obligation, by rank or formal responsibility, to expose himself in this way, yet he did so repeatedly and deliberately, fully aware of the danger. His behavior embodied the traditional ideals of the Victoria Cross: "most conspicuous bravery" and "self-sacrifice in the presence of the enemy." In the attritional warfare of Korea, where heroism often went unseen amid artillery barrages and night fighting, Speakman's actions stood out with rare clarity.

Following the war, William Speakman returned to civilian life and later adopted the surname Speakman-Pitt. Like many veterans of Korea, he carried his experiences quietly, rarely seeking public attention despite the prestige of his award. He remained closely associated with his regiment and was deeply respected within military and veterans' communities, attending commemorative events and maintaining strong bonds with former comrades. Those who knew him often remarked on his modesty and reluctance to dwell on his own heroism, a trait shared by many recipients of the Victoria Cross.

William Speakman died in 2018, closing a life that spanned post-war Britain and one of the Cold War's most intense and unforgiving conflicts. His Victoria Cross action at Maryang-san remains inseparable from the broader story of the Korean War—a war defined by harsh terrain, extreme weather, and ferocious close-quarter fighting. Yet within that wider struggle, his courage retains a distinct clarity. Armed with little more than grenades and determination, a private soldier repeatedly stepped forward when it mattered most, turning the tide of a desperate moment and inspiring others to do the same. His story endures not simply as a tale of bravery, but as a powerful reminder that leadership and resolve can emerge from any rank when circumstances demand it.

In the final reckoning, William Speakman's story illuminates both the character of the Korean War and the enduring nature of individual courage within it. His actions at Maryang-san were not isolated feats of daring divorced from their context, but a direct response to the brutal realities of hill fighting, exhaustion, and relentless enemy pressure. In a war often reduced to statistics, diplomatic stalemate, or vague Cold War abstraction, Speakman's conduct restores the human dimension: the moment when one soldier's resolve arrests collapse, steadies frightened men, and transforms desperation into resistance. His bravery demonstrates how, even in industrialized modern warfare, the outcome of a fight can hinge on personal initiative and moral courage.

Speakman's Victoria Cross also challenges narrow assumptions about leadership and heroism. He was neither an officer issuing orders nor a seasoned veteran shaped by years of combat command, but a private soldier who recognized what the situation demanded and acted without hesitation. His leadership was instinctive rather than institutional, emerging from character rather than rank. In this sense, his actions reflect the highest traditions of the British Army and the Commonwealth forces in Korea, where cohesion, mutual trust, and example often mattered more than formal authority. The inspirational effect of his conduct, men following him forward under fire, underscores how courage can be contagious when visibly demonstrated.

Beyond the battlefield, Speakman's quiet post-war life reinforces the distinction between heroism performed and heroism advertised. Like many veterans of Korea, he returned to a society that largely moved on, carrying memories of extreme violence and hardship without public recognition commensurate with their sacrifice. That Speakman bore his fame with humility only deepens the significance of his achievement, aligning personal modesty with extraordinary public honor. His life serves as a reminder that the Victoria Cross does not celebrate aggression or glory, but selflessness under the most severe conditions imaginable.

Ultimately, William Speakman's legacy endures as both a personal testament and a wider historical symbol. His courage at Maryang-san encapsulates the intensity of the Korean War and the often-overlooked sacrifices of those who fought it. More enduring still is the lesson embedded in his story: that in moments of crisis, when fear, fatigue, and uncertainty converge, the actions of a single individual can shape events far beyond their immediate reach. In remembering Speakman, we are reminded that heroism is not confined to grand strategy or famous names, but can arise, with devastating clarity, from the determination of one soldier who refuses to yield.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones

Battered by wind gusts, the Avro Lancaster bucked and lurched as its crew struggled to keep the plane aligned with the signal fires set by the French Resistance fighters two thousand feet below. The “Lanc,” one of the Royal Air Force’s (RAF) workhorse bombers, was a homely beast. It had four noisy propellers, a protruding snout, and a pair of ungainly tail fins. Built to drop bombs four miles above Dusseldorf and Dresden, the Lanc was ill-suited for the stealthy parachute operation it was being asked to perform in the predawn hours over Occupied France.

Timothy Gay explains the story of Stewart Alsop.

A Lancaster like this one deposited Alsop’s Jedburgh team and an SAS unit over Occupied France in August ’44. Source/Attribution: Photo: Cpl Phil Major ABIPP/MOD, available here.

Instead of its usual payload of thousand-pound bombs, the plane was carrying 18 members of two separate cloak-and-dagger outfits. A three-man team – two Americans, one Frenchman – from the ultra-secret Jedburgh program had orders to buttress BERGAMOTTE, a Maquis (Resistance) operation charged with harassing enemy movements on the roads and railways of south-central France.

During their months of training, the Jeds had been taught to mimic the Maqui’s tactical mantra: Surprise! Mitraillage! Evanouissement! (“Surprise! Kill! Vanish!”) Their goal, a Jed team leader mused years later, was to make the enemy believe it was “fighting the Invisible Man.”

After pulling off an ambush with their French partners, the Jeds learned to yell: “Foutez le camp!” Roughly translated, it meant “Scram! Let’s get the hell out of here!”

For weeks, Allied intelligence had worried that the BERGAMOTTE cell was being hounded by the German secret police, the Gestapo. Indeed, the brass feared that the Gestapo had not only seized control of BERGAMOTTE’s radio but had compromised its entire operation. The three Jeds were warned that cutthroat German agents – not to mention turncoat Frenchmen, too – might be lurking to snuff any Allied operative parachuted in from England.

“We had been given to understand,” the Jed team was to observe in its after-action report months later, “that Mission BERGAMOTTE might conceivably turn out to be the Gestapo in sheep’s clothing.”

Trust no “sheep,” the Jeds were instructed. The most innocuous-looking French villager could be a Gestapo stooge; ditto the head of the Maquis cell from the next town over.

Each Jed was given a personal cipher – an idiosyncratic phrase – to be used in emergency wireless transmissions in the all-too-likely event that they became separated, or if the mission went sideways.

Also waiting to leap out of the plane were 15 members of a coup de main (hard-hitting special forces) group, the Third French Parachute Battalion of the British Special Air Services (SAS). Once behind enemy lines, the SAS “rogue warriors,” as British historian Ben McIntyre has tabbed SAS commandos, had their own agenda of mischief and sabotage. Their chief objective was blowing up a bridge along the Route Nationale, the region’s main north-south artery, to hobble the Germans’ capacity to mobilize troops and armor.

Since the Lanc had no benches, the 18 commandos were sprawled on its floor, cramped against the cigar-shaped supply cylinders that would soon be dumped over their drop zone. An eerie blue light from a single bulb suffused the cabin.

   *

Nine full weeks after D-Day and just two days before the start of the “Champagne Campaign,” the Allies’ seaborne invasion of the Riviera, Adolf Hitler’s Wehrmacht had still not been ejected from France. The Lanc’s commandos were about to parachute atop thousands of trigger-happy German grenadiers and panicked Eastern European conscripts (Allied intelligence dismissively called them “Cossacks”), not to mention hundreds of members of the Milice, pro-Nazi Frenchmen who – it was now brutally clear – had backed the losing side.

The Milliciens knew that, if caught, they would pay for their treachery with their lives. They weren’t about to go down without exacting a bloodbath.

*

The Lanc’s unlikely first jumper, the 30-year-old American commander of the Jedburgh squad, had already crawled into position above the square hole carved aft of the plane’s bomb bay. His name was Stewart Johnnof Oliver Alsop. He was the scion of a Connecticut Yankee family whose ancestry could be traced to the Winthrops of Plymouth Plantation.

His facial features mirrored Hollywood matinee idol Robert Taylor’s: roguish blue eyes, an elongated patrician nose, mischievous eyebrows, and a mouth that always seemed to be suppressing a smile or a smirk. Even with a mop of brown hair hacked by military barbers, Alsop still radiated a Fitzgeraldian air of old money.

His mother, Corinne Robinson Alsop, was a niece of Theodore Roosevelt, a first cousin to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, and a distant cousin of Eleanor’s husband, Franklin Delano Roosevelt – or as Stewart’s father, a rock-ribbed Republican, called the president, “that crazy jack in the White House!”

A member of the Oyster Bay Roosevelt clan, Corinne had been equally disdainful of her Hudson Valley relation. When the young FDR came to Long Island to court Eleanor, Corinne derided him in her diary as a “feather duster” and hoped Eleanor would have the good sense to dump him.

The Alsops had been Republicans since the Whig Party disintegrated in the 1850s. Stewart’s old man, Joseph Wright Alsop IV, was a perennially frustrated Grand Old Party candidate for the Connecticut governorship. Stewart’s mother, a cofounder of the Connecticut League of Republican Women, had seconded the nomination of Alf Landon, her party’s 1936 presidential nominee. Despite Corinne’s stirring oratory, Landon carried only two states against her fifth cousin. Alas, neither of them was Connecticut.

Dining room debates between the elder Alsops and their more liberal offspring often ended with Pa braying at his kids to “go back to Russia!”

Stewart’s older brother by four years, Joseph Wright Alsop V, was already a respected columnist for the New York Herald Tribune and its national syndicate. With war looming in 1941, Joe volunteered for the U.S. Navy. He was serving in Burma as staff historian for aviator Claire Lee Chenault’s American Volunteer Group (later dubbed the “Flying Tigers”) when he was dispatched, in early December ‘41, to obtain supplies in Hong Kong. He was still in the city on December 7th and 8th, those nightmarish days when the Imperial Japanese military rampaged throughout the Pacific.

Joe shrewdly disposed of his uniform, borrowed civilian clothes, and pretended he was still an active correspondent. His ruse worked, sort of. For six months, the Japanese confined him to a detention camp for foreign noncombatants.

Corinne and Joseph IV, Ma and Pa as Stewart called them in his wartime letters, were never reticent about wielding their powerful connections. They pulled out all the stops to liberate young Joe, including petitioning that crazy jack in the White House. It worked: Joe was released in mid-’42 in a repatriation exchange of prisoners.

The Alsops were unrepentant Anglophiles, not surprising given their ancestral roots in the East Midlands and their allegiance to Endicott Peabody’s thoroughly British Groton School. As journalist Robert W. Merry noted decades later, “[The Alsops] always managed to get in the company of the high and the mighty throughout the world.” If their kin didn’t invent speaking with British affectation and a locked jaw, they helped perfect it.

Being high and mighty didn’t preclude Stewart from misbehaving at Yale. He got into hot water twice, once for pilfering all four hubcaps off a cop car, the other for getting caught with a young lady in his room. The second offense prevented him from graduating with his class.

Stewart had been in uniform prior to Pearl Harbor, but until ten days before his hush-hush mission to France, that khaki had belonged to His Majesty, not Uncle Sam. He had attempted on several occasions to join the U.S. Army but suffered from what his family labeled “white coat syndrome”: whenever a doctor armed with a sphygmomanometer was around, his blood pressure invariably spiked.

High blood pressure notwithstanding, Alsop was, along with a select group of other American Ivy League alums, invited by British bigwigs in the early fall of ‘41 to enlist in the elite King’s Royal Rifle Corps. The KRRC’s North American lineage had begun as the Royal American Regiment during the French and Indian War. When the upstart colonies fought to gain independence from the Crown, the regiment’s base was switched to the Caribbean, then Canada.

Its motto was Celur et Audax (“Swift and Bold”) – watchwords that rallied its riflemen from Waterloo to the Khyber Pass as they fought through the decades to safeguard the British Empire. The King himself served as the unit’s Colonel-in-Chief. KRRC’s “home” was the Hampshire city of Winchester and its fabled 900-year-old cathedral.

Among the other Americans ushered into the KRRC in ‘42 were future political commentator (and author of the memoir Eight is Enough); Tom Braden, a Dartmouth alum; another Dartmouth grad, Ted Ellsworth, who would go on to become a highly decorated infantry officer in both the British Eighth and U.S. First armies and survive a Nazi stalag; and George Thomson, a Harvard man whose service record would end up paralleling Alsop’s: the KRRC, the British Special Air Service (SAS), the British Special Operations Executive (SOE), the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS), and, ultimately, the Jedburghs.

The very social KRRC didn’t care about such trifling matters as Alsop’s blood pressure. They did care, however, that these sons of American privilege bring their white dinner jackets for evening fêtes and their hunting rifles for England’s grouse season.

It turned out that Alsop didn’t don black or white tie all that often. Having completed more than a year of training in England, he survived Tunisia’s oppressive summer heat as one of General Bernard Montgomery’s Desert Rats after the Axis forces surrendered at Bizerte.

In the fall of ’43, the KRRC moved across the Mediterranean as the Allies slogged their way up Italy’s Tyrrhenian and Adriatic coasts. Alsop served as an infantry platoon leader in the British Eighth Army’s push along Italy’s eastern edge. In October, his KRRC Second Battalion was in Monty’s spearhead south of the River Trigno. At one point the Trigno skirmishing grew so fierce that Alsop and his platoon were forced to take refuge in a farmhouse.

 A month later, the Second Battalion joined elements of the 8th Indian Division in leading Monty’s assault on Casa Casone, a German stronghold atop the River Sangro. It took two attempts and gruesome nighttime fighting before Casa Casone surrendered.

In December, Alsop and his fellow KRRC officer Thomson, then 25, sought transfers to the U.S. Army. But their repeated efforts were rebuffed in Tunisia and Egypt. For a time, the pair was in what Alsop described as “military limbo.”

Thanks to the connections of an English grande dame whose favor Thomson had cultivated in Cairo, the two briefly joined Britain’s hell-for-leather SAS before being transferred back to England in early ’44. Alsop and Thomson soon volunteered for the SOE, the clandestine intelligence service created by Prime Minister Winston Churchill to wreak havoc behind Nazi lines.

On August 3, 1944, Alsop was at long last granted his request to transfer to the U.S. Army. He was immediately assigned to the OSS, SOE’s American counterpart. Together, SOE and OSS had devised the Jedburgh commando program to help Resistance fighters in France and the Low Countries disrupt the Wehrmacht before, during, and after the Allies’ cross-channel invasion. Some four dozen Jedburgh missions had already jumped off to Occupied Europe by the time Alsop’s Lanc went airborne.

Alsop was still getting used to be being called “Loo-tenant” after being addressed as “Leff-tenant” for more than a year. He also had to remind himself that American soldiers saluted their superiors with a straight-edged right hand, as opposed to the British Army custom of a flat-hand-to-the-forehead, part of an elaborate ritual that included stamping both feet and emitting a full-throated “Sir!,” which, given the accents involved, often came out more like “Suh!”

In the pell-mell rush to get ready for the Jedburgh jump, there had not been time for Alsop to requisition a U.S. Army uniform, so he borrowed one from his younger – and considerably shorter and chunkier – brother John, a former military policeman then also in training as a Jedburgh commando. Stewart continued to wear his KRRC insignia, his British marksmanship medals, his Mediterranean campaign ribbons, and his SAS wings on his ill-fitting American garb – a curious decision that, a few weeks later in the wilds of France, caused enough confusion in the mind of an American lieutenant colonel to nearly get Alsop shot as an enemy spy.

The dashing 30-year-old with the impeccable pedigree was about to hit the silk wearing an outfit that made him look like an unkempt schoolboy.

                                                                      *

Little about Stewart Alsop’s breeding hinted that he’d make a kick-ass commando in a war to save the world from fascism. The Alsops may have been longtime fixtures in effete America, with tentacles that seemed to reach everywhere, but they didn’t exactly have a reputation for martial heroics.

In the 1960s, the Saturday Evening Post commissioned Stewart, then its Washington columnist, to research and write about his family heritage. He learned that Joseph Wright Alsop I, his great-great-grandfather, paid for someone to take his place in George Washington’s Continental Army. Eight decades later, that same dodge was repeated by Joseph Wright Alsop III, who managed to evade service in Abraham Lincoln’s Grand Army of the Republic by hiring a surrogate.

Indeed, as far as Stewart could tell, no forebear named Alsop had ever served as a soldier.

“It was not so much that my ancestors were cowards, though no doubt some of them were,” he wrote years later. “They just hated the idea of being in a subordinate and dependent position.”

Perhaps it was that wariness that compelled one John Alsop, a New York delegate to the Second Continental Congress in 1776, to balk at signing a little document known as the Declaration of Independence. John Alsop managed to pull a reverse “John Hancock”; in Alsop family lore, he was known as “John the Non-Signer.”

Past and future Alsops never declined opportunities to fatten their pocketbooks, however. Like so many New England colonial families, the Alsops, then living in the Connecticut seaport Middletown, made their fortune in West Indies trade. Alsop ships carried ice and other commodities south to the Caribbean, then peddled barrels of rum back home. They also dabbled in triangular trade with China and England, bringing back to the colonies coveted plate ware – and perhaps, Stewart coyly hinted in his memoirs, some opium, too.

                                                                          *

One hundred sixty-eight years, one month, and nine days after an Alsop refused to sign Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration, Stewart Alsop found himself enmeshed in a Jedburgh mission bollixed up from the get-go. When the three Jeds arrived the evening of August 12, 1944, at the RAF’s Tempsford Airfield some 50 miles northeast of London, no one was expecting them.

“It soon became apparent,” Alsop wrote in his after-action report, “that no one had the faintest notion who we were or what to do with us, and that furthermore no one was particularly interested.”

He and his Jed mates had to scramble to find their plane, which turned out to be a Lancaster planted on the runway, already revving its engines. It was crewed by Canadian airmen about to take off on their first sortie (ever!) over enemy territory. Moreover, they’d had no training in parachute operations – a pair of disquieting facts probably not shared with the Jeds as they climbed aboard.

Most of the SAS men were already jammed into the cabin. Two other sticks of SAS paratroopers were on different planes warming up at Tempsford. The three planes were supposed to fly together to execute a coordinated drop in the Limoges-Périgeux corridor of central France’s Creuse Department, a hilly region that for weeks had been besieged by a Wehrmacht offensive targeting the Resistance.

“Maquis Creuse kaput!,” German soldiers had bragged to French villagers, dragging their fingers across their throats. Far from kaput, BERGAMOTTE principals had been alerted by London to ignite their signal fires some two hours after midnight on August 13th.

Somehow, the jump master expert at pinpointing when and where special ops paratroops should be released over hostile turf failed to show up. He was replaced by a corporal, a nervous rookie unfamiliar with the RAF methodology for low-altitude drops: a sequence of flashing red and green lights accompanied by a series of commands – “Action Stations! . . . Running In! . . . Number One, Go! . . . Number Two, Go! . . .”

Poised to jump immediately after Alsop were the two other members of his Operation ALEXANDER Jedburgh team: a St. Cyr-trained lieutenant and saboteur named Renè de la Tousche, whose nom de guerre (to protect his family in the event he was captured or killed behind Nazi lines) was Richard Thouville; and a 19-year-old sergeant and radio operator from Montclair, New Jersey, named Norman “Dick” Franklin.

Each was carrying an M-I carbine, a Colt revolver, an entrenching tool to bury his parachute, a large knife, a string of grenades, a canteen, a first aid kit, an E&E (Escape and Evasion) kit with camouflaged silk maps of south-central and southwestern France, a tiny compass, a little knife that looked like a razor, a wire for garroting enemy sentries, a fishing line and hooks in case other food sources failed, a packet of amphetamines to stave off sleep, a chocolate bar, a pack of cigarettes, and a small flask of brandy.

Their pre-mission briefing a few days earlier had taken place in a glass-encased room on the highest floor of a “safe house” in London. They were perched above the surrounding buildings and could glimpse the tops of the trees in Hyde Park. In mid-meeting, Franklin spotted an airborne V-1 buzz bomb. Just after it passed overhead, its motor stopped – then the most ominous sound in London, because it meant an imminent plunge and explosion. Seconds later, the doodlebug detonated in the park.

The three of them had bonded during months of training at Milton Hall, a rambling Cambridgeshire manor that SOE and OSS had taken over for special ops prep. “Milton Hall was a fantastic Elizabethan pile, country seat of an old, aristocratic, and formerly exceedingly rich English family,” Alsop and Braden wrote after the war in their book, Sub Rosa. Among many other arduous tasks, Jed trainees were obligated to make eight practice parachute jumps and do plenty of cardiovascular work.

 On long-distance runs in the East Anglian countryside, Alsop would look around, determine that no superior officers were extant, and declare to Thouville and Franklin, his handpicked charges, that it was time to “relax-ey-vous.”

The trio would slip behind a stonewall or a hedgerow and swap stories and smokes. When Thouville reminded Alsop that “relax-ey” was not a real French verb, the American feigned outrage and snapped something like: “Well, dammit, it ought to be!”

Thouville’s métier in these sessions was an apparently bottomless cache of bawdy jokes about French clerics and their parishioners, delivered in a combination of broken English and snarky French. With each telling, Thouville’s gags got more hilarious, Franklin remembered in his unpublished memoir.

Alsop’s comrades were amused that someone with such a patrician background could be so playful and irreverent. The Connecticut Yankee would readily concede that his upbringing had made him class-conscious – and to a fault. But he took exception if anyone accused him of being pompous.

“Stuffy, yes,” Alsop would admit, impish eyes twinkling. “But pompous? Never!”

Early on, Alsop had made the mistake of telling his American KRRC buddies that his surname was properly pronounced with a soft “a,” as in “ball,” not a hard “a,” as in “pal.” Instantly, of course, he was dubbed “Al,” a screw-you moniker that stuck with him through the war. After that gaffe, he was gun-shy about discussing his famous family: It took him a half-year to own up about being related to the Roosevelts.

The three Jeds had been rehearsing their parachute drop for months, on top of every other move they would need to survive a long stretch behind enemy lines, from learning colloquial French and studying Gaullist vs. Communist Resistance politics to mastering Jiu Jitsu hand-to-hand combat and teaching Maquis fighters how to operate mortars and makeshift radios.

Alsop’s codename was “Rona.” Franklin’s was “Cork.” Thouville’s was “Leix.”

On three previous occasions in early August, Rona, Cork, and Leix had been called to an East Anglian airfield and told their operation would launch that night. Each time, the mission had, for one reason or another, been scrubbed. But the fourth time, despite the logistical challenges, they went wheels-up just after 10 p.m.

Some 90 minutes into the flight, somewhere over southern Normandy, the Lanc began to rear “like a startled horse,” Alsop remembered. “Le flak!” Thouville shouted into Alsop’s ear.

While on the front lines in Italy, Alsop had been attacked by rifles, machine guns, mortars, aerial bombs, and 88’s, the Germans’ deadly artillery weapon. But this was his first experience with an ack-ack assault. It felt, Alsop recalled, like a violent thunderstorm – except a lot more dangerous. Franklin, the radioman, likened flak to “someone beating a large tin pan with a wood spoon.”

Bloodred tracers appeared out of nowhere, followed by deafening explosions that seemed to happen beneath both wings. Just when they thought the Lanc was out of range, another fusillade would erupt. Amid one barrage, Alsop looked around at his fellow commandos: To a man, they were protecting their crotches.

Once the plane cleared Normandy, the flak began to recede. By then, the other two planes in the formation had scattered. The neophyte Canadians were flying solo.

A half-hour or so later, the Lanc’s airmen thought they had zeroed in on the correct Resistance bonfires in the fields southwest of the Creuse Department’s Monts de Guéret, the Drop Zone (or “Dee Zed,” in British military parlance) for both Team ALEXANDER and the SAS squad. But turbulence kept knocking the Lanc off course.

One minute the crew would have the L-shaped fires in sight; the next they would disappear. Wrestling with the controls, the pilots took a couple of passes over what they surmised was the Dee Zed.

The rookie jump master got more nervous with each pass. Before leaving British airspace, the Jeds had tried to teach the “Action Stations!” progression to him. But now it seemed too complicated.

“Look, chaps,” Alsop remembered the corporal yelling above the din. “I’ve never done this before, and I don’t want to get it wrong!”

The dispatcher hollered to Alsop that he would flash a single red light – and that as soon as Alsop saw it, he should drop through the hole. Alsop nodded and shouted for Thouville and Franklin to get ready.

Thouville bleated, “J’ai une trouille noire,” into Alsop’s ear. Yeah, I’m a little black hole, too, Alsop chuckled.

Alsop tried hard to remember what he’d learned in those eight practice jumps: “Hold straight, head on chest, legs together, pull the webs, don’t reach out for the ground. . .”

As they’d been taught, Thouville wrapped his legs around Alsop’s neck and shoulders; Franklin did the same to Thouville’s. The SAS guys crept closer to the hole.

*

His legs dangling out of the Lanc, Alsop’s thoughts surely drifted to the bride he’d left behind in London. He had been married, for all of 54 days, to a beguiling Yorkshire lass 12 years his junior named Patricia “Tish” Hankey.

They had met two years earlier, in August 1942, when Alsop and his smooth-talking KRRC pal Thomson had somehow wangled invitations to a soiree being held at the Yorkshire estate of England’s Premier Baron, the nobleman at the top of the peerage pyramid. To their delight, they discovered that real American-style martinis – not the watered-down British imitations – were being served at the party. Even better, a pair of attractive young Englishwomen were swilling the gin-and-vermouth with abandon. Even better yet, the women appeared to be returning the Americans’ glances.

Thomson deftly handled the introductions. The taller of the two girls informed Alsop, whose hair had just been buzzed by a KRRC barber, that he “looked like a criminal,” which Alsop viewed as an encouraging flirtation.

With their lipstick, rouge, and martini-guzzling, the women appeared to be in their early twenties. They weren’t.

The belle Thomson was eyeing turned out to be the baron’s 18-year-old daughter, Bee. Tish, the object of Alsop’s attention, was only 16, an unsettling fact that Alsop discovered only after he finagled a midnight kiss in the garden – or so he claimed in his memoirs. Alas, their embrace was witnessed by the Premier Baron himself, who promptly ratted them out to his wife, who in turn blew the whistle to Tish’s parents.

The baron’s censure got their romance off to a rocky start. Despite her parents’ disapproval and Alsop’s prolonged absence in the Mediterranean, they pined for one another. When Alsop resurfaced in Britain in early ‘44, they were determined to get married.

Still, it took Alsop months to convince Tish’s stodgy father and her devoutly Catholic mother to let their daughter wed a considerably older Protestant Yank. Despite his lofty American relations, Alsop was a man of (relatively) humble means. In prewar New York, he had earned a modest salary editing books for Doubleday.

The deliberations with Tish’s father turned testy, but Alsop was smitten; he refused to take “no” for an answer. Her father relented, but only after making Alsop jump through hoops to guarantee his daughter some measure of financial security should he perish in France. With the cross-Channel invasion then going full throttle, “Alsop, S., Lt., KIA” was a distinct possibility. The Hankeys had already lost a son (by coincidence, he had also served in the KRRC) to Hitler’s Afrika Korpsin Libya; they didn’t want their daughter widowed while still a teen.

Tish and Stewart nevertheless took their vows exactly two weeks after D-Day in a side altar at St. Mary’s Catholic Chapel in Chelsea. The main altar had not recovered from the bomb damage it suffered four years earlier during the Blitz, a blast that killed 19 locals sheltering in its crypt that night.

Both the wedding ceremony and their reception in a top-floor suite at The Ritz (a boozy affair underwritten by Stewart’s brother-in-law, Percy Chubb, of the Connecticut insurance family) were interrupted by V-1 rocket attacks. At one point, the revelers raced up a stairwell to The Ritz’s rooftop to watch buzz bombs zoom over Piccadilly. Fortunately for the Jedburgh program and future Alsop progeny, the doodlebugs missed Mayfair – at least that day.

Allied intelligence, of course, forbade Stewart from sharing details of his mission to France – or even acknowledging the existence of the Jedburgh program. Tish, therefore, knew little of her new husband’s special ops background.

Intrigue and subterfuge, however, cut both ways. For a year-and-a-half prior to their wedding, Tish had worked sub rosa at wartime London’s spy central, the art deco structure at 55 Broadway SW1 in the heart of Westminster. Her building shared secrets with its dingy cousin across the street, 54 Broadway, the headquarters of Britain’s spy chief Stewart Menzies and scores of espionage and sabotage specialists, all plotting the destruction of Hitler’s Reich.

Tish had been, since the day she turned a precocious 17 (!), a naval decoding analyst for MI5, Britain’s counterintelligence agency. In early April 1944, her 13th month on the job, she received a message from the Home Fleet that the methodically planned Operation TUNGSTEN had succeeded: in a sneak attack off the Norwegian coast, Germany’s über-battleship Tirpitz had been decimated by British carrier planes.

The news triggered jubilation on both sides of Broadway, at 10 Downing Street, at Whitehall’s cabinet offices, at Bletchley Park’s codebreaking station, and at the Supreme Headquarters of the Allied Expeditionary Forces (SHAEF) in South London’s Bushy Park.

When Tish, then barely 18, raced up several flights of stairs to share the news with her friend Bee, a fellow MI5 decoder, the two of them jumped up and down, then danced a little jig.

Tish and her new husband didn’t completely fess up about their respective derring-do until after the war. No wonder their daughter, writer Elizabeth Winthrop Alsop, called her 2022 memoir, Daughter of Spies.

Just days before obtaining his long-awaited commission in the U.S. Army, Alsop had gotten news that he’d earned an elevation to captain in the British Army. The transfer came with a catch: if he wanted to join the Yanks, he’d have to accept a demotion in rank back to lieutenant. But pay in the U.S. Army dwarfed the Brits. Alsop would make a lot more as a Yank lieutenant than as a Tommy captain. He took the transfer.

Tish helped her new spouse pin his American lieutenant’s bars on the shoulder pads of his borrowed uniform. When Franklin saw them, he chortled and informed his boss that the bars were turned the wrong way.

There was another secret that Tish may have been keeping from Stewart in the second week of August 1944: she was already pregnant.

*

More anxious minutes passed inside the Lanc. Alsop remained fixated on reacting to the dispatcher’s signal. The plane continued to fight the wind.

Alsop, Thouville, and Franklin couldn’t be certain, but it felt like the Lanc was flying in aimless circles. They worried that every German soldier and hostile mercenary in a 30-mile radius was now on full alert. If the commandos didn’t jump soon, the crew would have no choice but to head back to England. Given the enemy’s ack-ack guns, flying over the Normandy battlefield after daybreak would have been in Alsop’s reckoning, “suicide.”

Suddenly, a light flashed inside the plane. Alsop didn’t hesitate or double-check with the jump master. He wriggled through the hole and pushed hard with both hands. Off he plummeted into a moonlit French night.

As soon as his chute jolted open, he knew he’d made a mistake; the plane was flying too high and too fast. To avoid detection, Allied commandos had been trained to jump at 800 feet from a stalled-out aircraft; the Lanc, Alsop sensed, was flying at a height at least double the desired altitude. It was traveling so fast, moreover, that Alsop could feel thewhoosh from the prop wash – not the way a jump from a semi-static craft was supposed to feel.

Alsop looked up. The parachutes of Thouville and Franklin were nowhere to be seen.

He later learned that the jump master had flipped on his flashlight to fish out a cigarette. Alsop mistook the corporal’s nicotine fix for the “Go!” signal; the American had leapt out of the plane way too early. The horrified dispatcher restrained Alsop’s comrades from following their commander out the hole.

Hurtling toward the ground, Alsop craned his neck in three directions but couldn’t see the Resistance reception committee signal fires. A mission fraught with danger had suddenly gotten even more perilous.

Alsop could hear dogs barking – probably not the best omen, he remembered thinking. “Even before I hit the ground, I realized that I had been a damn fool,” he was to write.

Seconds later, he thudded into the edge of a wooded area. His chute got tangled in a small tree. It turned out to be fortuitous; he found himself hanging just inches off the ground.

He slithered out of his harness and touched French soil for the first time in the war. While behind German lines over the next three months, Alsop and his men would collude with merciless Maquis leaders; hector enemy convoys; help liberate a host of villages; throttle the Wehrmacht’s capacity to move; bivouac in the woods some nights and bunk in lavish chateaus on others; patch up differences (at least temporarily) between rival Resistance leaders; watch in amazement as French fighters and clerics unearthed rifles that had been hidden months earlier in cemetery graves; hear wild stories about German paratroopers trying to infiltrate Allied and Resistance strongholds while disguised as French priests; uncover a supposed Nazi superweapon unknown to Allied intelligence; and be toasted as heroes almost everywhere they went.

Maquisards came to respect Alsop so much they nicknamed him the “Commandant Americain.” Somehow, the Commandant and his two Jed subordinates lived to tell their tale.

But with his parachute snared in a tree, Alsop’s first moments as a guerilla fighter did not get off to an auspicious start. He frantically tried – and failed – to free his chute from the tree. The mission had barely begun, and he’d already managed to mess up two core Jedburgh rules: Never leave your men behind and never leave your chute exposed.

He snuck behind a big bush, lit a cupped cigarette, took a tug on his brandy, and surveyed the situation. His next moves were not readily apparent; there were no good options.

Squinting through the moonlight, he could make out what he thought was a hamlet not far down a dirt road. His best chance of survival, he decided, would be to sneak into town, knock on a door, and pray that its occupants were friendly to the Allied cause and not peeved about being rousted out of bed in the middle of the night by a Yank officer with an uneven grasp of French.

He stubbed out his cigarette and began inching down the path, his head on a swivel. All the sudden, the dog yapping started up again, but this time louder and more conspicuous.

“Keee-riiist!” he recalled thinking. “How could the German army not hear that?!”

Alsop retreated to the same bush, took a big swig from his flask, and lit another smoke. At this rate, the pack would be gone before sunup. So would his brandy.

Three decades later, he wrote, “I was entirely alone in Occupied France. I was in [an] American army uniform. I had no idea where I was.”

“Face it, Alsop,” he muttered aloud. “You’re in trouble.”

 

Timothy M. Gay is the Pulitzer-nominated author of two books on World War II, two books on baseball history, and a recent biography of golfer Rory McIlroy. He has written previous WWII-related articles for the Daily Beast, USA Today, and many other publications.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones

Jack Cornwell was born on the 8th of January, 1900 in Leyton, then part of Essex, into a working-class family for whom life offered few comforts and little security. He grew up in modest surroundings and attended local schools, where he was remembered as a quiet, unassuming boy rather than an exceptional student or natural adventurer. Like many boys of his generation, Cornwell was drawn to the Royal Navy by a mixture of patriotism, the promise of steady pay, and the romance of the sea. At just fifteen years old he enlisted as a Boy Seaman in 1915, undergoing training at HMS Impregnable before being posted to active service at an age when most of his contemporaries were still in school.

Terry Bailey explains.

The image of Jack Cornwell as used by the press at the time of his death. It is now thought to show a younger brother.

In early 1916 Cornwell was assigned to HMS Chester, a newly commissioned light cruiser of the Royal Navy's 3rd Light Cruiser Squadron. As a Boy First Class, his duties included serving as a sight setter and loader on one of the ship's 5.5-inch guns, a demanding role that required discipline, precision, and physical stamina. Despite his youth, Cornwell adapted quickly to the routines of naval life and the responsibilities of combat readiness. By the end of May 1916, Chester was operating in the North Sea as part of the British Grand Fleet, soon to be drawn into the largest naval engagement of the First World War.

The Battle of Jutland, fought between the 31st of May and the 1st of June 1916, was the long-anticipated clash between Britain's Grand Fleet under Admiral Sir John Jellicoe and the German High Seas Fleet commanded by Vice-Admiral Reinhard Scheer. Both sides sought to gain decisive control of the North Sea, a strategic prize that would shape the course of the war. The British aimed to maintain their naval blockade of Germany, while the Germans hoped to weaken British sea power by isolating and destroying portions of the Grand Fleet. The battle unfolded amid confusion, smoke, poor visibility, and rapidly shifting tactical situations, with dozens of capital ships and cruisers exchanging fire over vast distances.

HMS Chester became engaged during the early phases of the battle when she encountered a group of German light cruisers. Outgunned and exposed, Chester came under intense and accurate enemy fire. Several German shells struck the ship, causing heavy casualties among the gun crews. One shell burst close to Cornwell's gun position, killing or disabling nearly the entire crew and inflicting severe wounds on Cornwell himself. He suffered multiple injuries to his chest and legs, wounds that would ultimately prove fatal. Despite his pain and loss of blood, Cornwell refused to leave his post. Standing alone amid the wreckage, he continued to load and aim the gun, awaiting orders and prepared to fire if commanded.

Cornwell remained at his station until the fighting subsided and Chester withdrew from the action. Only then was he discovered by officers, still upright beside the gun, gravely wounded but steadfast in his duty. He was taken to the hospital upon the ship's return to port, but his injuries were too severe. Jack Cornwell died on the 2nd of June 1916, just over a day after the battle, at the age of sixteen. His conduct, marked by extraordinary courage, discipline, and devotion to duty in the face of overwhelming danger, was soon reported to the Admiralty.

In recognition of his actions, Cornwell was posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross, the highest award for gallantry in the British and Commonwealth armed forces. The citation emphasized that he "remained standing alone at a most exposed post, quietly awaiting orders," despite being mortally wounded. His youth made his bravery all the more striking, and his story resonated deeply with a nation exhausted by war and loss. Cornwell was given a hero's funeral in London, attended by thousands, and his grave became a site of public remembrance.

The Battle of Jutland itself remains a subject of debate among historians. Tactically, the German Navy could claim a measure of success, having sunk more British ships and inflicted heavier immediate losses. However, strategically, the battle was a clear victory for Britain. The Royal Navy retained command of the sea, and the German High Seas Fleet, though not destroyed, was effectively contained. After Jutland, the German fleet rarely ventured out in strength again, conceding naval dominance to Britain and ensuring that the blockade of Germany remained intact for the remainder of the war.

Jack Cornwell's legacy endures as one of the most powerful symbols of youthful courage in British military history. He was not a seasoned warrior or a decorated officer, but a teenage sailor who, when tested under the most extreme conditions, displayed unwavering resolve and selflessness. His story embodies the quiet heroism of ordinary individuals caught in extraordinary circumstances. It serves as a reminder that courage is not measured by age or rank, but by the willingness to stand fast in the face of fear and duty.

Jack Cornwell's story endures not because it is dramatic in the conventional sense of battlefield heroics, but because of its profound simplicity. In the chaos and terror of Jutland—the smoke-filled decks, the thunder of naval guns, and the sudden loss of comrades around him, Cornwell did not perform a single spectacular act meant to turn the tide of battle. Instead, he did something far rarer and more revealing: he stayed. Mortally wounded, isolated, and fully aware of the danger, he remained at his post, embodying the quiet discipline and sense of duty instilled in him by the Royal Navy and embraced by him as a personal moral code. His courage was not impulsive or reckless, but calm, steadfast, and deeply human.

In a war often remembered for its industrial scale and impersonal slaughter, Cornwell's actions restore the individual to the center of history. He reminds us that the outcome of great events, whether a vast naval engagement like Jutland or the broader struggle of the First World War is shaped not only by admirals, strategies, and fleets, but by the conduct of ordinary men and boys placed in extraordinary circumstances. His youth, far from diminishing his heroism, underscores it, revealing how responsibility and bravery were borne by those scarcely beyond childhood during the conflict.

More than a century later, Jack Cornwell remains a symbol rather than a statistic, a name that speaks to sacrifice without bitterness and courage without bravado. His Victoria Cross represents not only gallantry under fire, but also the enduring values of duty, resilience, and selflessness in the face of overwhelming odds. In remembering Cornwell, we honor not just one young sailor, but an entire generation whose quiet endurance helped shape the course of history, and whose sacrifices continue to resonate long after the guns of Jutland fell silent.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

The Kellogg Brothers founded a powerful and impactful cereal company in 1906. They were also innovators in the health and wellness fields and were members of organizations that were ahead of their time - and fought against what was then considered a healthy lifestyle. The Kellogg Brothers left a lasting positive legacy on the health and wellness industry.

Daniel Boustead explains.

John Harvey Kellogg.

William Keith Kellogg.

The Kellogg brothers’ longest-lasting contribution to the Health industry is their product, Kellogg’s Cornflakes.  Dr. John Harvey Kellogg’s (1852-1943) trek towards Kellogg’s Cornflakes began as a search for a breakfast substitute to help treat his patients at the Battle Creek Sanitarium who were suffering from stomach problems.[1]  This was a consistent complaint of his patients. A disabled gastrointestinal system caused the patient’s stomach problems. Dr. Kellogg discovered that the half-baked breakfast mush he had previously been serving patients was causing dyspepsia. He also felt that the replacement should also be “pre-cooked”. The creation of Kellogg’s Corn Flakes involves conflicting accounts, in which, in the end, Dr. Kellogg, his wife, Ella, and Dr. Kellogg’s brother, Will (1860-1951), should receive some credit for its creation.[2]

Dr. John Harvey Kellogg applied to the U.S. Patent Office for his patent on “Flaked Cereal and Process for Preparing the Same”(No.558,399) on May 31st, 1895.[3] The U.S. Patent Office granted Dr. Kellogg this patent on April 14th, 1896.  In the patent itself, Dr. Kellogg included flakes made of oats, corn, barley, and other grains in addition to wheat flakes to protect his patent.

In the summer of 1895, Will and Dr. Kellogg introduced the Corn Flakes at the General Conference of the Seventh-Day Adventists at the Battle Creek Sanitarium.[4] The dish became a hit with conference attendees, who would add milk, cream, or yogurt to it.

 

Company formed

In 1906, Will Kellogg founded the Battle Creek Toasted Corn Flake Company.[5] In 1907, he changed the company’s name to the Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Company.[6] In the late summer to early fall of 1907, Kellogg’s Cornflakes made its official debut to the American public.[7] It was under Will Kellogg’s leadership that, during the Great Depression in 1933, the Kellogg company made a gross profit of $6 million (about $110 million in today’s money).[8] This was at a time when many companies were going bankrupt or struggling to maintain a profit.  In 1939, Will Kellogg retired as the company's head.

Dr. Kellogg was also a trailblazer in other ways in the field of health and wellness. The Battle Creek Sanitarium began in 1866 as the Health Reform Institute.[9] “Sister” White presented her ideas about Christian biblical healthy living at the Seventh-day Adventist General Conference on May 20th, 1866. The  General Conference approved the creation of an institute for health reform.[10] It was the governing body of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The organization opened its doors for business as The Western Health Reform Institution on September 5th, 1867.[11] On October 1st, 1876, Dr. Kellogg became the medical director of the Western Health Reform Institute.[12] The Western Health Reform Institute became the Battle Creek Sanatorium on September 15th, 1910.[13] On the same date, Dr. Kellogg told this audience how the new institution should be called Sanitarium or San, because he felt it better suited the mission. From 1876 to 1943, Dr. Kellogg was at the head of the Western Health Reform Institute, later known as the Battle Creek Sanitarium.[14] Several years before his death, Dr. Kellogg estimated that his work at the Sanitarium brought him into contact with approximately 250,000 persons.[15]

At the Battle Creek Sanitarium, if a patient were suffering from the “blues,” they would be placed under an electric light cabinet to help them get sunlight. There was not much natural sunlight in southeastern Michigan during the Fall.[16] In this field, Dr. Kellogg was years ahead of his time in terms of medical treatment for seasonal affective disorder or SAD.  

In 1916, at the Battle Creek Sanitarium, patient meals were also served with a card attached that specified the proper ratio of calories, proteins, carbohydrates, and fats to be consumed at the meal.[17] An example of this document is dated from May 19th, 1916. This was unheard of in the field of dieting and nutrition at the time.

Also at the Battle Creek Sanitarium, Dr. Kellogg would lead aerobics and calisthenics with the patients, backed by a brass band.[18] This was so popular that, in 1923, the Columbia Gramophone Company released 10 78-RPM shellac discs of Dr. Kellogg’s class, complete with a booklet. The album was entitled “John Harvey Kellogg’s HEALTH LADDER”.  In the booklet, there were exercises for the back, abdomen, legs, and arms that Dr. Kellogg recommended for his patients at the Battle Creek Sanitarium. This was decades ahead of the exercise craze led by Jack Lalanne, Richard Simmons, and other such international figures.

Although Dr. Kellogg never received credit for this, he encouraged his patients at the Battle Creek Sanitarium,  after surgery, to get up, move, and perform graded, deep-breathing exercises. [19] This was in stark contrast to the standard procedure of the day, which was to have patients confined to hospital beds for several days to weeks at a time. In the present day, medical procedures, early ambulation, and breathing exercises are the backbone of most recovery protocols after surgery.

 

Patents & Pioneers

In 1934, Dr. Kellogg received a patent for his “Soy Acidophilus Milk”.[20]  Dr. Kellogg devised this concoction to deal with babies who couldn’t deal with cow’s milk-based formulae, as well as his patients at the San who were suffering colitis, duodenal or gastric ulcers, babies who rejected their mom’s breast milk, constipation, and excessive flatulence. This was a step forward in addressing digestive and gastric health compared to the treatments of the day. By 1935, patients at the Battle Creek Sanitarium were consuming over 200 gallons a week of  Dr.Kellogg’s “Soy Acidophilus Milk”. The Battle Creek Sanitarium’s patients’ favorite way to enjoy Dr. Kellogg’s “Soy Acidophilus Milk” was with ripe bananas and a side of soy milk.  This predated the soy milk craze that you see today all over the world.

Dr. Kellogg and Will Kellogg were pioneers in the fight against tobacco and its harmful effects. Dr. Kellogg had discovered through increasing medical evidence that tobacco smoke caused heart disease, lung disease, digestive disorders, infections, and neurological problems.[21] In 1922, Dr. Kellogg published a successful book entitled Tobaccoism, or How Tobacco Kills. Along with Henry Ford’s book, The White Slaver, these books became a cornerstone of the progressive movement’s failed anti-smoking campaign.  Will Kellogg considered smoking to be so dangerous that he demanded that his workers at his factory either quit or he would fire them. He thought tobacco was more dangerous than drinking alcohol.[22]

Dr. Kellogg also thought that tobacco products interfered with proper muscular and growth development, caused gastric ulcers, unduly taxed the liver and kidney systems, injured the brain and nervous systems, and also impaired judgment and moral sensibility.[23] All of Dr. Kellogg’s claims have subsequently been supported by medical science, medical doctors, and research studies, except for the moral sensibility claim.

In the aftermath of World War I, Dr. Kellogg was the president of the Michigan Anti-Cigarette Society and the Committee of Fifty to Study the Tobacco Problem.[24]  Henry Ford was also a prominent member of the Committee of Fifty to Study the Tobacco Problem. Dr. Kellogg, with the help of this group, also produced the very first motion picture to address the dangers of tobacco smoking. He and his brother Will were pioneers in their opposition to tobacco products at a time when the tobacco companies were powerful and used their influence to suppress knowledge about the dangers of their products.

In the USA, the dangers of tobacco products did not reach the Federal level until January 11th, 1964, when the Surgeon General issued the 1964 Report on Smoking and Health.[25] In this report, it linked smoking to the cause of emphysema, chronic bronchitis, coronary heart disease, and increased statistical risk of lung cancer. The effects of this report were featured in television and radio reports in the USA and in foreign countries. The Kellogg Brothers knew about the dangers of smoking long before the US government did.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Kellogg Brothers founded an important cereal company that shaped  America’s idea of breakfast. They were also innovators in medical science and wellness. Dr. Kellogg and his brother Will’s opposition to tobacco products was well ahead of its time. The Kellogg Brothers' beliefs also went against the American and foreign understanding of tobacco and its adverse effects. This was a time when the tobacco Industry held a stranglehold on the public consciousness in America and elsewhere. The Kellogg Brothers’ courage in publicizing their findings left a legacy on health and wellness concepts that are still felt today.

 

Did you find that piece interesting? If so, join us for free by clicking here.

 

 

Works Cited Page

Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.

National Library of Medicine: Profiles in Science, Reports of the Surgeon General, The 1964 Report on Smoking and Health. Accessed on November 26th, 2025, https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/nn/feature/smoking.

Schwartz, Richard W. John Harvey Kellogg: Pioneering Health Reformer. Hagerstown: Maryland. Review and Hearld Publishing Association.2006.

Wilson, Brian C. Dr. John Harvey Kellogg: And the Religion of Biologic Living. Bloomington & Indianapolis. Indiana University Press. 2014.

 

[1] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.  20 and 112.

[2] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.  20 and 129 to 133.

[3] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 133.

[4] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 134.

[5] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.XIV.

[6] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.279.

[7] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 280.

[8] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 264.

[9] Schwartz, Richard W. John Harvey Kellogg: Pioneering Health Reformer. Hagerstown: Maryland. Review and Hearld Publishing Association.2006.62.

[10] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 89.

[11] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 90.

[12] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 92.

[13] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 95.

[14] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 95; Wilson, Brian C. Dr. John Harvey Kellogg: And the Religion of Biologic Living. Bloomington & Indianapolis. Indiana University Press. 2014. XI.

[15] Schwartz, Richard W. John Harvey Kellogg: Pioneering Health Reformer. Hagerstown: Maryland. Review and Hearld Publishing Association.2006.62.

[16] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 187.

[17] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 187 to 188.

[18] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.  190 to 191.

[19] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 195 and 200.

[20] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017.   330 to 331.

[21] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 224.

[22] Markel, Howard. The Kelloggs: The Battling Brothers of Battle Creek. New York: New York. Vintage Books. 2017. 224 to 225.

[23] Schwartz, Richard W. John Harvey Kellogg: Pioneering Health Reformer. Hagerstown: Maryland. Review and Hearld Publishing Association.2006. 59.

[24] Schwartz, Richard W. John Harvey Kellogg: Pioneering Health Reformer. Hagerstown: Maryland. Review and Hearld Publishing Association.2006. 107.

[25] National Library of Medicine: Profiles in Science, Reports of the Surgeon General, The 1964 Report on Smoking and Health. Accessed on November 26th, 2025, https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/nn/feature/smoking.

Thomas Eugene Kelly was born on the 25th of December, 1919 in Worcester, Massachusetts, and grew up in an America shaped by economic hardship and the lingering trauma of the First World War. Raised during the Great Depression, Kelly belonged to a generation for whom military service was often seen as both duty and opportunity. Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in December 1941, he enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in April 1942. Like many young Marines, he was forged by demanding training and an unforgiving discipline designed to prepare men for a form of warfare unlike anything the United States had previously faced: amphibious assaults against a determined and well-entrenched enemy across the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean.

Terry Bailey explains.

Thomas G. Kelley. Source: Johnny Bivera, MilitaryHealth, available here.

By the time Kelly reached combat, the Pacific War had evolved into a brutal contest of attrition. The early Japanese successes of 1941–1942 had been reversed through a relentless Allied counteroffensive, characterized by "island-hopping" campaigns aimed at bypassing strongholds while seizing strategically vital positions. Battles such as Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Saipan, and Peleliu had demonstrated both the effectiveness and the staggering human cost of this strategy. Japanese forces, increasingly isolated and cut off from resupply, fought with extraordinary tenacity, often to the last man, guided by a military culture that emphasized honor, sacrifice, and resistance to surrender. It was into this unforgiving environment that Kelly and the men of the 5th Marine Division were sent in early 1945.

Iwo Jima represented one of the most formidable objectives of the entire Pacific campaign. A small, barren volcanic island located roughly halfway between the Mariana Islands and Japan, it was prized for its airfields, which could support Japanese interceptors and, if captured, provide emergency landing grounds for American B-29 bombers attacking the Japanese home islands. Anticipating an invasion, Lieutenant General Tadamichi Kuribayashi, the Japanese commander on Iwo Jima, rejected traditional beach defense tactics. Instead, he oversaw the construction of an elaborate underground defensive network of tunnels, bunkers, caves, and reinforced pillboxes, allowing his approximate 21,000 defenders to survive bombardment and emerge to fight with deadly efficiency.

When U.S. Marines landed on Iwo Jima on the 19th of February, 1945 they encountered resistance far more intense than expected. The soft volcanic ash slowed movement, while hidden Japanese positions delivered overlapping fields of fire. Casualties mounted rapidly as Marines struggled to advance yard by yard against an enemy that remained largely invisible. Kelly, serving with the 3rd Battalion, 27th Marines, found himself in the midst of this hellish landscape as the battle ground on through late February, with both sides locked in a savage struggle for control of the island's rugged terrain.

On the 25th of February, 1945 Kelly's company was ordered to seize and hold a strategically vital hill that dominated the surrounding area. The position was heavily defended by Japanese troops manning well-camouflaged strongpoints, supported by machine guns and rifle fire that pinned the Marines down and inflicted serious losses. As the attack stalled and the situation grew increasingly perilous, Kelly acted with decisive courage. Without waiting for orders, he moved forward alone, deliberately exposing himself to intense enemy fire as he closed with the Japanese positions.

Armed with grenades and his rifle, Kelly assaulted one fortified position after another at close range. He destroyed enemy emplacements by hurling grenades into firing ports and engaging defenders directly, often within a few yards. During these actions, he was repeatedly wounded, yet he refused evacuation or medical treatment, continuing to advance despite blood loss and physical pain. His fearless movement across open ground drew enemy fire away from his pinned comrades and provided a rallying point for the rest of the company, which began to advance behind his example.

The Japanese soldiers Kelly faced were veteran defenders operating within Kuribayashi's carefully designed defensive system. They were disciplined, well-trained, and resolute, fighting from mutually supporting positions intended to maximize American casualties. Many were armed with machine guns, rifles, grenades, and mortars, and they exploited the terrain expertly. That Kelly was able to overrun multiple such positions single-handedly speaks to both his extraordinary bravery and the ferocity of the resistance he confronted. By neutralizing key enemy strongpoints, he played a decisive role in allowing his unit to secure the hill and hold it against further attack.

At the end of the action, Kelly had personally accounted for a significant number of enemy soldiers and silenced several critical defensive positions. His conduct under fire was not only tactically decisive but psychologically transformative, inspiring exhausted and battered Marines to press on in one of the most grueling battles of the war. For his conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity above and beyond the call of duty, Thomas Eugene Kelly was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. The citation emphasized his repeated solo assaults, his refusal to withdraw despite severe wounds, and the inspirational leadership he displayed under the most extreme combat conditions.

The Battle of Iwo Jima ultimately lasted more than a month and resulted in nearly 7,000 American dead and over 26,000 casualties, making it one of the bloodiest engagements in Marine Corps history. Of the roughly 21,000 Japanese defenders, almost all were killed. The battle became emblematic of the Pacific War's final phase, illustrating both the strategic necessity and the immense human cost of the campaign. Kelly's actions stand out even within this context of widespread heroism, representing the individual courage that underpinned American success in the face of fanatical resistance.

After the war, Kelly was discharged from the Marine Corps and returned to civilian life, bearing the lasting effects of his wounds. Unlike many public war heroes, he lived quietly and did not seek fame or attention for his achievements. He remained proud of his service and of the men with whom he had fought on Iwo Jima, viewing his Medal of Honor as a testament to their collective sacrifice rather than personal glory. Thomas Eugene Kelly died on the 9th of March, 1981 and was laid to rest with military honors.

The story of Kelly's actions endures as part of the broader story of the Pacific campaign, a conflict defined by endurance, sacrifice, and extraordinary acts of courage on both sides. On the shattered volcanic slopes of Iwo Jima, his determination and selflessness helped turn the tide at a critical moment, saving lives and securing ground that had been paid for in blood. His story remains a powerful reminder of the human dimension of war, and of how individual resolve can shape the outcome of history's most brutal battles.

In conclusion, Thomas Eugene Kelly's story brings into sharp focus the essential truth of the Pacific War: that its vast strategies and sweeping offensives ultimately depended on the courage of individuals willing to act under unimaginable pressure. On Iwo Jima, a battle defined by attrition, concealment, and relentless violence, Kelly's actions cut through the paralysis of fear and exhaustion at a moment when failure would have meant further loss of life and momentum. His willingness to advance alone against fortified positions, despite repeated wounds, embodied the Marine Corps ethos of perseverance and initiative, demonstrating how a single Marine's resolve could alter the course of a local engagement and, in doing so, contribute to a larger strategic victory.

Kelly's gallantry cannot be separated from the broader human cost of Iwo Jima. The hill he helped secure was not merely a tactical objective but part of a battlefield where every yard of ground was contested at staggering expense. His heroism stands as a representative example of the countless acts of bravery displayed by Marines who fought in conditions of extreme deprivation, uncertainty, and danger. That Kelly later viewed his Medal of Honor as a symbol of collective sacrifice rather than individual achievement underscores the shared burden borne by those who survived and those who did not.

In the decades since the battle, Iwo Jima has come to symbolize both the necessity and the tragedy of total war in the Pacific. Kelly's quiet post-war life, marked by humility rather than self-promotion, reinforces the enduring divide between wartime heroism and peacetime remembrance. He carried the physical and emotional scars of combat without seeking recognition, allowing his actions on the battlefield to speak for themselves. In doing so, he reflected the experience of an entire generation for whom service was a duty fulfilled, not a platform for acclaim.

Ultimately, Thomas Eugene Kelly's legacy lies not only in the Medal of Honor he received but in what his conduct reveals about courage under fire. His story reminds us that history is shaped as much by individual decisions made in moments of extreme peril as by grand strategies and commanding figures. On Iwo Jima, amid ash, steel, and relentless resistance, Kelly's determination saved lives and inspired others to endure. Remembering his actions ensures that the sacrifices of those who fought in the Pacific are neither abstracted nor forgotten, but understood through the lives of the men who bore the war at its most brutal point.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones

The European scramble for Africa, the period of imperial expansion in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was motivated by a variety of reasons. An examination of different sources reveals that the driving force behind the colonization of Africa was mainly economic, fueled by the need for raw materials and new markets. Political rivalries, technological advances, and cultural ideologies were contributory factors, but they were ultimately secondary to the overarching economic imperative.  To understand this expansion, one must look at the convergence of the Industrial Revolution’s demands and the geopolitical climate of the era. 

Shubh Samant explains.

A 1906 Marseille Colonial Exhibition poster. It demonstrates European colonial achievements.

A 1906 Colonial Exhibition poster in Marseille, France.

The Berlin Conference

The term “Scramble for Africa” itself reflects the speed, intensity, and competitive nature of this imperial race. Between roughly 1880 and 1914, European powers carved up nearly the entire continent, often with little regard for existing African societies, cultures, or political boundaries. The Berlin Conference of November 15, 1884 to February 26, 1885, convened by Otto Von Bismarck, symbolized this process, as European nations sat around a table in Berlin and drew borders on maps that would later become the foundations of modern African states. This conference was not about African voices or African agency; it was about European powers negotiating among themselves to avoid conflict while maximizing their territorial and economic gains. The General Act of the Berlin Conference established the principles of "effective occupation," which required powers to demonstrate physical presence and administration to claim sovereignty, further accelerating the rush to the interior.

 

The Economic Engine

The Industrial Revolution was the force that created an economic push, since it had established an unprecedented need for raw materials. Some examples of natural resources present in Africa included cotton, palm oil, rubber, and minerals. These resources were important to the industries of Europe, and gaining access to them was of the utmost importance. There were economic motivations which pushed the European powers to colonize and tap the wealth of Africa. With the need for new markets in rise, the majority of Africans were perceived as a wonderful opportunity for new markets for European-made manufactured goods. By 1870, industrial output in Europe had reached a point where domestic markets were becoming saturated, leading to a "Long Depression" that made overseas expansion look like a financial necessity.

The economic logic was straightforward: industrial economies in Britain, France, Germany, and Belgium required steady supplies of inputs to sustain production. African rubber fed the tire industry, palm oil was used in soaps and lubricants, cotton supplied textile mills, and gold and diamonds enriched European treasuries. Beyond raw materials, Africa also represented a potential consumer base. Even though most Africans had limited purchasing power, imperialists imagined vast markets where European goods could be sold. This vision of Africa as both a warehouse of resources and a marketplace for manufactured products was central to the imperial project. The discovery of the Witwatersrand gold reef in 1886 transformed South Africa into a focal point of global finance, drawing in billions in European capital and cementing the economic priority of the region.

 

Political Rivalry and the Rise of Nationalism

While economic reasons were the most significant driver, political rivalry also provoked the scramble for Africa. The extent of European control by 1914 was overwhelming, leaving just two nations (Ethiopia and Liberia) independent. This is indicative of the fierce competition among European nations, each searching for more power and prestige, National pride and the desire to retain power were strong incentives for colonization, as suggested by Freidrich Fabri. Even these political incentives, though, were intertwined with economic ones, as colonies also symbolized a source of wealth and power. Fabri argued in 1879 that for a new nation like Germany, colonial expansion was a vital necessity to maintain its standing among older powers.

Nationalism was a powerful force in late 19th-century Europe. Countries like Germany and Italy had only recently unified, and their leaders sought colonies as a way to demonstrate strength and legitimacy on the global stage. France, still reeling from defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, looked to Africa to restore its prestige. Britain, already the world’s leading imperial power, sought to maintain its dominance by controlling strategic territories such as Egypt and South Africa. Colonies became symbols of national greatness, and losing ground to rivals was seen as a humiliation. Thus, political rivalry was inseparable from the economic quest, as each empire measured its success not only in wealth but also in the size of its colonial holdings. The "Great Game" was no longer confined to Asia; it had moved to the African continent, where every square mile gained was seen as a blow to a neighbor.

 

Technological Advancements and Military Dominance

Technological innovations greatly aided European imperialism. Steamships, railroads, etc. allowed Europeans to penetrate into the African interior and overcome the logistical challenges. The invention of the Maxim gun further enhanced European military superiority. These technological innovations were ultimately tools to achieve the economic goals. Without these advancements, the "Dark Continent" would have remained largely inaccessible to large-scale European administration.

The role of technology cannot be overstated. Prior to the late 19th century, much of Africa remained inaccessible to Europeans due to disease, geography, and logistical difficulties. The discovery of quinine as a treatment for malaria reduced mortality rates among Europeans and made deeper incursions possible. Railroads allowed for the rapid transport of goods from the interior to coastal ports, while steamships shortened travel times between Europe and Africa. The Maxim gun, the first fully automatic machine gun, gave European armies overwhelming military superiority over African forces armed with spears, muskets, or outdated rifles. These innovations created the infrastructure and military dominance necessary to sustain imperial control, ensuring that economic exploitation could proceed with minimal resistance. At the Battle of Omdurman in September 02, 1898, British forces used Maxim guns to kill roughly 11,000 Mahdist warriors while losing only 47 of their own men, illustrating the terrifying disparity in power.

 

Cultural Justifications and Social Darwinism

There were cultural beliefs, such as “The White Man’s Burden” philosophy, that gave a moral reason for European imperialism. These cultural beliefs were used to cover up economic reasons for it. Although there were some Europeans who sincerely believed they were there to civilize the native Africans, they were largely motivated by a desire to acquire wealth and minerals. In general, while the scramble for Africa had a variety of reasons, it was the economic ones which were primary. It was the need for raw materials, markets, and investment opportunities that propelled the rush of the colonization of Africa. Political rivalries, technological changes, and cultural mentality served as underlying factors, but were complementary to the strong economic factors. Social Darwinism provided a pseudo-scientific framework that ranked races, suggesting that the "survival of the fittest" applied to nations and justified the domination of the "weaker" by the "stronger."

The cultural dimension of imperialism was deeply intertwined with notions of racial superiority and paternalism. Rudyard Kipling’s famous poem “The White Man’s Burden” encapsulated the idea that Europeans had a moral duty to “civilize” non-European peoples. Missionaries traveled to Africa to spread Christianity, often believing they were saving souls, but their efforts also paved the way for colonial administrations. Education systems were introduced that emphasized European values, languages, and histories, while African traditions were marginalized or dismissed as primitive. This cultural justification provided a veneer of morality to what was essentially economic exploitation. By framing imperialism as a benevolent mission, European powers could present themselves as altruistic actors, even while extracting immense wealth from African lands. However, the "civilizing mission" often translated into the dismantling of local governance and the imposition of European legal codes that prioritized property rights for settlers over indigenous land use.

 

African Resistance

As Europeans entered the lands of Africa, so did the Africans resist. African resistance was not a monolith; it ranged from diplomatic negotiation and tactical alliances to full-scale guerrilla warfare and religious uprisings. One of the most significant examples of sustained military resistance was led by Samori Touré, the founder of the Wassoulou Empire. Between 1882 and 1898, Touré utilized a sophisticated "scorched earth" policy and moved his entire empire eastward to evade French forces. His ability to manufacture and repair his own firearms locally allowed him to resist for sixteen years, proving that African states were capable of high-level military organization.

In East Africa, the Maji Maji Rebellion (July 1905 to July 1907) demonstrated the power of spiritual unity. Diverse ethnic groups in German East Africa (modern-day Tanzania) united against forced cotton cultivation. Rebels believed that a sacred water (maji) would turn German bullets into water. While the Germans eventually suppressed the uprising through a manufactured famine that killed hundreds of thousands, the rebellion forced the colonial administration to reform its more brutal labor policies, showing that even "failed" resistance could alter the colonial trajectory.

Perhaps the most striking exception to European dominance was the Ethiopian Empire under Emperor Menelik II. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Menelik II recognized the importance of modernizing his military early. He played European powers against one another to purchase modern rifles and artillery. When Italy attempted to impose a protectorate, the Ethiopian army decisively defeated the Italian forces at the Battle of Adwa on March 01, 1896. This victory ensured Ethiopia remained the only indigenous African state to maintain its independence throughout the Scramble, providing a powerful symbol of hope for future Pan-African movements.

Furthermore, resistance often took place within the colonial system itself. In West Africa, the "Aba Women's War" of November 1929 saw thousands of Igbo women in Nigeria organize mass protests against the British "Warrant Chiefs" and the imposition of new taxes. Through "sitting on" the chiefs, a traditional form of shaming, the women successfully forced the colonial government to drop the tax plans and reform the local administration. These examples illustrate that while the Scramble was a period of intense European aggression, African agency was never extinguished; rather, it adapted to the new realities of imperial rule.

 

Conclusion

By 1914, Africa was almost entirely under European control, and the continent’s political, economic, and cultural landscapes had been dramatically reshaped. The legacy of this period continues to affect Africa today, as many post-independence states inherited borders, institutions, and economic structures created during colonial rule. The scramble for Africa was not merely a historical episode of conquest; it was a transformative moment that altered global power dynamics, enriched European nations, and imposed lasting challenges on African societies. The transition to independence in the mid-20th century was frequently complicated by these extractive colonial structures, which were not designed for democratic self-governance.

In conclusion, the scramble for Africa was driven primarily by economic imperatives, but it was reinforced by political rivalries, technological innovations, and cultural ideologies. The industrial revolution created the demand for raw materials and markets, nationalism fueled competition among European powers, technology enabled conquest and control, and cultural beliefs provided moral justification. Together, these factors produced one of the most dramatic episodes of imperial expansion in world history. Yet beneath the rhetoric of civilization and progress lay the fundamental reality: Europe’s hunger for wealth and resources was the true engine of colonization. The scramble for Africa was, at its core, an economic enterprise cloaked in the language of politics, technology, and morality. By the time the dust settled, the continent was irrevocably tied to the global capitalist system, a tie that persists in the modern era's neo-colonial economic relationships.

 

Did you find that piece interesting? If so, join us for free by clicking here.

 

 

References

  • Fabri, Friedrich. (1879). Bedarf Deutschland der Colonien? (Does Germany Need Colonies?).

  • Headrick, Daniel R. (1981). The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century

  • Hobson, John A. (1902). Imperialism: A Study.

  • Hochschild, Adam. (1998). King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa.

  • Kipling, Rudyard. (1899). The White Man's Burden: The United States and the Philippine Islands.

  • Pakenham, Thomas. (1991). The Scramble for Africa: White Man's Conquest of the Dark Continent from 1876 to 1912.

  • Said, Edward W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism.