As soon as the fire became visible beyond the ship, bystanders from nearby boats and on shore rushed to aid the stricken steamer. One rescuer story that got extensive newspaper coverage was that of teenager Mary McCann, a recent immigrant from Ireland who was recuperating from an illness at the isolation hospital on North Brother Island. Mary ran to the shore and swam out time after time to pull as many children as she could to safety. Reports of the number she saved range from six to twenty depending on the newspaper account.

Here, Richard Bluttal looks at the June 1904 General Slocum disaster in New York City in which over 1,000 people died.

A picture of the General Slocum.

The New York Times wrote about the staff at the North Brother Island hospital, who immediately rushed to aid the beached ship. They not only pulled people from the water using ladders and human chains, but also resuscitated victims and provided medical care. The New-York Tribune described a story similar to Mary’s, in which a hospital employee named Pauline Puetz swam out multiple times to pull victims ashore, even rescuing a child who had been caught in the ship’s paddlewheel.

The New York Evening World wrote about 12-year-old Louise Galing, who jumped into the water with the toddler she was babysitting and managed to keep ahold of the child until they were pulled from the water. The World also recounted that when young Ida Wousky would have fainted, 13-year-old John Tishner kicked his friend in the shins to wake her up. John then managed to find a life preserver and put it on Ida, pushing her into the water when she wouldn’t jump. He held onto her by her n hair until they were rescued by a boat. 

It was, by all accounts, a glorious Wednesday morning on June 15, 1904, and the men of Kleindeutschland—Little Germany, on Manhattan’s Lower East Side–were on their way to work. Just after 9 o’clock, a group from St. Mark’s Evangelical Lutheran Church on 6th Street, mostly women and children, boarded the General Slocum for their annual end-of-school outing. Bounding aboard what was billed as the “largest and most splendid excursion steamer in New York,” the children, dressed in their Sunday school outfits, shouted and waved flags as the adults followed, carrying picnic baskets for what was to be a long day away.

A German band played on deck while the children romped and the adults sang along, waiting to depart. Just before 10 o’clock, the lines were cast off, a bell rang in the engine room, and a deck hand reported to Captain William Van Schaick that nearly a thousand tickets had been collected at the plank. That number didn’t include the 300 children under the age of 10, who didn’t require tickets. Including crew and catering staff, there were about 1,350 aboard the General Slocum as it steamed up the East River at 15 knots toward Long Island Sound, headed for Locust Grove, a picnic ground on Long Island’s North Shore, about two hours away. The Slocum headed out from its berth at 3rd Street on the East River at about 9:30 am with a band playing and the passengers joyously celebrating the smooth ride and beautiful weather. The excursion vessel had been chartered to take the group—almost all of them women and children—from Manhattan to picnic grounds on Long Island.

 

The Fire

As the ship reached 97th Street, some of the crew on the lower deck saw puffs of smoke rising through the wooden floorboards and ran below to the second cabin. But the men had never conducted any fire drills, and when they turned the ship’s fire hoses onto the flames, the rotten hoses burst. Rushing back above deck, they told Captain Van Schaick that they had encountered a “blaze that could not be conquered.” It was “like trying to put out hell itself.”  A fire began in the forward cabin, the steamboat General Slocum caught fire in the East River of New York City, including many children. In the course of 20 minutes an estimated 1,021 people died, mostly women and children.

In the neighborhood of Little Germany families were decimated, many losing a mother and two or more children. In some cases entire families were killed. At the Lutheran Cemetery in Middle Village, Queens, over 900 victims were buried, including 61 in a mass grave for the unidentified.

 

Addressing the disaster

Onlookers in Manhattan, seeing the flames, shouted for the captain to dock immediately. Instead, Van Schaick, fearing the steering gear would break down in the strong currents and leave the Slocum helpless in midriver, plowed full speed ahead. He aimed for a pier at 134th Street, but a tugboat captain warned him off, fearing the burning ship would ignite lumber stored there. Van Shaick made a run for North Brother Island, a mile away, hoping to beach the Slocum sideways so everyone would have a chance to get off. The ship’s speed, coupled with a fresh north wind, fanned the flames. Mothers began screaming for their children as passengers panicked on deck. As fire enveloped the Slocum, hundreds of passengers hurled themselves overboard, even though many could not swim.

The crew distributed life jackets, but they too were rotten. Boats sped to the scene and pulled a few passengers to safety, but mostly they encountered children’s corpses bobbing in the currents along the tidal strait known as Hell Gate. One newspaper described it as “a spectacle of horror beyond words to express—a great vessel all in flames, sweeping forward in the sunlight, within sight of the crowded city, while her helpless, screaming hundreds were roasted alive or swallowed up in waves.”  Although the captain was ultimately responsible for the safety of passengers, the owners had made no effort to maintain or replace the ship's safety equipment. The main deck was equipped with a standpipe connected to a steam pump, but the fire hose attached to the forward end of the standpipe, a 100 ft (30 m) length of "cheap unlined linen", had been allowed to rot and burst in several places. When the crew tried to put out the fire; they were unable to attach a rubber hose because the coupling of the linen hose remained attached to the standpipe. The ship was also equipped with hand pumps and buckets, but they were not used during the disaster; the crew gave up firefighting efforts after failing to attach the rubber hose.   The crew had not practiced a fire drill that year, and the lifeboats were tied up and inaccessible. (Some claim they were wired and painted in place.) 

Survivors reported that the life preservers were useless and fell apart in their hands, while desperate mothers placed life jackets on their children and tossed them into the water, only to watch in horror as their children sank instead of floating. Most of those on board were women and children who, like most Americans of the time, could not swim; victims found that their heavy wool clothing absorbed water and weighed them down in the river.

Passengers trampled children in their rush to the Slocum‘s stern. One man, engulfed in flames, leaped over the port side and shrieked as the giant paddle wheel swallowed him. Others blindly followed him to a similar fate. A 12 year-old boy shimmied up the ship’s flagstaff at the bow and hung there until the heat became too great and he dropped into the flames. Hundreds massed together, only to bake to death. The middle deck soon gave way with a terrific crash, and passengers along the outside rails were jolted overboard. Women and children dropped into the choppy waters in clusters. In the mayhem, a woman gave birth—and when she hurled herself overboard, her newborn in her arms, they both perished.

The captain beached the burning vessel on North Brother Island, but the stern of the ship, where most of the passengers had been forced by the fire, was left in ten to thirty feet  of water. Though there were life preservers  and lifeboats aboard, poor maintenance and neglect had made many of them useless. 

Unlike the Titanic which sank eight years later, where the crew was organized and disciplined in evacuating the ship, most of the Slocum crew of thirty six men pushed passengers out of the way and abandoned ship. The crew had never been trained in a fire drill and the few lifeboats on board were never lowered – they were wired down.

The panicked passengers were left to fend for themselves. The life preservers were strapped to the ceiling of the ship’s deck and were out of reach of many of the women and children. Those who could grab a life preserver had a nasty surprise waiting for them.

The Slocum and its life preservers had “passed inspection” only weeks before, without ever actually being checked. In reality the life preservers were rotten – filled with dried, pulverized cork.

When some passengers tried putting them on, they disintegrated in their hands. Others  who managed to jump into the water wearing the “good” life preservers, sank like a boulder was weighted around them.

Not only was the pulverized cork filling of the life preservers waterlogged without an iota of buoyancy, it seems some of the life preservers had metal weights added to them to bring their weight specifications up to standards. Fire hoses of the cheapest kind were also rotten from age and neglect, ruptured when activated and were rendered useless.

Women who strapped life preservers onto their children and tossed their small, loved ones overboard, watched in horror as they disappeared without ever coming back to the surface.

Weighed down by their heavy clothing and struggling against a strong tide, 400-600 passengers drowned after the ship was beached. Though estimates vary, a government report commission  into the disaster reported 955 passenger deaths—or about 70 percent.

Van Shaick was believed to be the last person off the Slocum when he jumped into the water and swam for shore, blinded and crippled. He would face criminal charges for his ship’s unpreparedness and be sentenced to 10 years in prison; he served four when he was pardoned by President William Howard Taft on Christmas Day, 1912.

 

Aftermath

 Within an hour, 150 bodies were stretched out on blankets covering the lawn and sands of North Brother Island. Most of them were women. One was still clutching her lifeless baby, who was “tenderly taken out of her arms and laid on the grass beside her.” Rescued orphans of 3, 4 and 5 years old milled about the beach, dazed. Hours would pass before they could leave the island, many taken to Bellevue Hospital to treat wounds and await the arrival of grief-stricken relatives.

At Riverside Hospital on North Brother Island, where patients with typhoid and other contagious diseases had been quarantined, staff spotted the burning vessel approaching and quickly prepared the hospital’s engines and hoses to pump water, hoping to douse the flames. The island’s fire whistle blew and dozens of rescuers moved to the shore. Captain Van Schaick, his feet blistering from the heat below, managed to ground the Slocum sideways about 25 feet from shore. Rescuers swam to the ship and pulled survivors to safety. Nurses threw debris for passengers to cling to while others tossed ropes and life preservers. Some nurses dove into the water themselves and pulled badly burned passengers to safety. Still, the heat from the flames made it impossible to get close enough as the Slocum became engulfed from stem to stem.

Since there was no manifest of passengers the final death toll will never be exact, but it was probably more than 1021.  The official police report put the number at 1031 and The Brooklyn Eagle newspaper listed 1204 as dead or missing.

In the neighborhood of Little Germany families were decimated, many losing a mother and two or more children. In some cases entire families were killed. At the Lutheran Cemetery in Middle Village, Queens, over 900 victims were buried, including 61 in a mass grave for the unidentified.

The owners of the General Slocum, The Knickerbocker Steamboat Company escaped jail time for negligence. Knickerbocker President Frank Barnaby was indignant at people wanting to sue him or his company. Knickerbocker filed suit that a limit be fixed to their liability claimed by the plaintiffs as the number of suits grew for loss, damage and injury.The liability limit they wanted was not to exceed the value of the boat. That is the value of the boat after the fire and beaching and termination of the excursion should not exceed the sum of  for all the victims collectively — $5,000. That would amount to less than $5 paid per fatality and injured.

The owners then had the gall to claim that under maritime law that sum should be subject to the fees of the salvage and wreckage services performed. Essentially, they were claiming they should be limited to the current value of their wrecked boat which would be close to nothing. Sure enough, besides a fine they had to pay, Knickerbocker ended up paying nothing to the survivors or the victims’ families.

Ship safety inspectors Henry Lundberg and John Fleming who had passed the General Slocum despite numerous violations were indicted. Lundberg was tried three separate times for manslaughter but was never convicted.

Eight people were indicted by a federal grand jury after the disaster: the captain, two inspectors, and the president, secretary, treasurer, and commodore of the Knickerbocker Steamship Company.

Most boatmen felt that Van Schaick "was unjustly made a scapegoat for the resulting tragedy, instead of the owners of the steamer or the effectiveness of the life saving and fire fighting equipment then required — and the inspections of it by government inspectors". He was the only person convicted. He was found guilty on one of three charges: criminal negligence, for failing to maintain proper fire drills and fire extinguishers. The jury could not reach a verdict on the other two counts of manslaughter. He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. He spent three years and six months at Sing Sing prison before he was paroled. President Theodore Roosevelt declined to pardon Van Schaick. Van Schaick was finally released when the federal parole board under the William Howard Taft administration voted to free him on August 26, 1911. He was pardoned by President Taft on December 19, 1912; the pardon became effective on Christmas Day. After his death in 1927, Schaick was buried in Oakwood Cemetery (Troy, New York).

The neighborhood of Little Germany, which had been in decline for some time before the disaster as residents moved uptown,  almost disappeared afterward. With the trauma and arguments that followed the tragedy and the loss of many prominent settlers, most of the Lutheran Germans remaining in the Lower East Side eventually moved uptown. The church whose congregation chartered the ship for the fateful voyage was converted to a synagogue in 1940 after the area was settled by Jewish residents.

 

What do you think of the General Slocum Disaster? Let us know below.

Now read Richard’s article on the role of baseball in the US Civil War here.

Slavery in New York has a long and sad history. Here, Richard Bluttal provides an in depth history of the subject from the 17th to the 19th century, from the Atlantic slave trade era to the end of slavery and beyond.

A depiction of an early slave auction in New York (then New Amsterdam). By Howard Pyle.

First Slaves Arrive in New World in 1619

Twenty Africans, carried on a Dutch ship, are brought to Jamestown, Virginia, to be sold as indentured servants, not slaves, a fine distinction that probably escaped their notice.

Jamestown had exported 10 tons of tobacco to Europe and was a boomtown. The export business was going so well the colonists were able to afford two imports which would greatly contribute to their productivity and quality of life. 20 Blacks from Africa and 90 women from England. The Africans were paid for in food; each woman cost 120 pounds of tobacco. The Blacks were bought as indentured servants from a passing Dutch ship low on food, and the women were supplied by a private English company. Those who married the women had to pay their passage--120 pounds of tobacco.

With the success of tobacco planting, African Slavery was legalized in Virginia and Maryland, becoming the foundation of the Southern agrarian economy. Very important when cotton becomes the main source of the economy by time of the cotton gin 1793.

Atlantic Slave Trade and the Middle Passage

Both Maryland and Virginia were in need of a more permanent source of labor: slaves. Although Massachusetts was the first colony to recognize slavery, Maryland and Virginia soon followed, with both colonies legalizing slavery during the 1660s.

Since some African chiefs or kings could increase their wealth by working closely with slave traders, one tribe might capture the warriors of another tribe and then sell their prisoners of war into slavery. Astonishingly, hundreds of thousands torn from their villages and homes survived degradation and deprivation to become the almost 4 million people held in slavery in 1860, at the eve of the Civil War.

Triangular Trade receives its name from the shipping routes that connected Europe, Africa, the West Indies, and North America in the transatlantic commerce of slaves and manufactured goods. These routes began in England, where goods were shipped to Africa. Nearly one-third of all slave voyages were outfitted in Liverpool, London, Bristol, and other ports in Britain. French vessels from such ports as La Rochelle, Le Havre, Bordeaux, and Nantes made up another 13 percent.

In Africa, the goods were then traded for slaves bound for the Americas. Known as the Middle Passage, the forced voyage from the freedom of Africa to the auction blocks of the Americas was a physical and psychological nightmare that lasted several weeks or months. Having unloaded their cargoes in the colonies, the ships returned to England laden with tobacco, sugar, cotton, rum, and other slave-produced items. This trade pattern continued with some modifications into the early nineteenth century.

In order to maximize profits and offset any losses, most captains packed as many Africans as possible into the holds of their ships. During the late 1600s and throughout the 1700s, most English ships that sailed directly from Africa to the colonies carried about 200 enslaved Africans. Later slave ships could carry as many as 400 slaves with a crew of 47.

Slaves were chained in pairs (the right arm and leg of one chained to the left leg and arm of another), and men and women were separated from each other. All of them were forced to lie naked on wooden planks below deck in extremely hot quarters. At times, small groups of slaves were allowed to come on deck for exercise; some of them were forced to dance. Women and children could occasionally roam the deck, but men were allowed on deck for only a short while. Heat, limited sanitary facilities (sometimes buckets for human waste were not emptied for long periods of time), and epidemics from diseases such as smallpox and dysentery together produced an unbearable stench onboard. An outbreak of disease could devastate an entire cargo of enslaved Africans, and an estimated 15 to 20 percent of slaves probably died on route to the colonies, primarily from diseases resulting from overcrowding, spoiled food, and contaminated.

Many also died of starvation and thirst. Yet captains most feared slave mutinies, 250 of which scholars estimate took place. As a result, those slaves who were disruptive or likely to cause a mutiny were thrown overboard.

Because of the stench and disease, many slave ships had to be abandoned after about five years. Eventually ships were built especially for human cargo, with shackling irons, nets, and ropes as standard equipment. During this process slaves were frequently and harshly flogged, sometimes with a paddle but more often with a whip that had a lead ball sewn on its end. They were also forced to learn how to speak a new language, eat new foods, and obey White masters.

At last, when the ship we were in, had got in all her cargo, they made ready with many fearful noises, and we were all put under deck, so that we could not see how they managed the vessel. ...The stench of the hold while we were on the coast was so intolerably loathsome....The closeness of the place, and the heat of the climate, added to the number in the ship, which was so crowded that each had scarcely room to turn himself, almost suffocated us. This produced copious perspirations, so that the air soon became unfit for respiration, from a variety of loathsome smells, and brought on a sickness among the slaves, of which many died -- thus falling victims to the improvident avarice, as I may call it, of their purchasers.

  • Dr Alexander Falconbridge describes the middle passage:

    The slaves lie on bare planks. The surgeon, upon going between decks, in the morning, to examine the situation, frequently finds several dead. These dead slaves are thrown to the sharks.

    It often happens that those who are placed at a distance from the latrine buckets, in trying to get to them, tumble over their companions, as a result of being shackled. This situation is added to by the tubs being too small and only emptied once every day.
    Fever - Alexander Falconbridge (a ship's doctor), An Account of the Slave Trade (1788)
    Some wet and blowing weather having caused the port-holes to be shut, fluxes and fevers among the negroes followed. I frequently went down among them, till at length their apartments became so excessively hot as to be only bearable for a very short time...
    The floor of their rooms was so covered in the blood and mucus which had come from them because of the flux, that it resembled a slaughter-house.

New York’s Involvement

Some of New York’s merchants and bankers profited directly by financing and participating in the Atlantic Slave trade.  In memoirs published in 1864, Captain James Smith, a convicted slave trader, claimed that in 1859 85 ships capable of  carrying between 30 and 60,000 enslaved Africans were outfitted in the port of NY to serve the slave markets of Cuba. “ I can go down to South Street, and go into a number of houses that help fit out ships for the business.” The trade was so profitable that on one voyage, a ship that cost $13,000 to fit her out completely, “ delivered a human cargo worth $220,000 to Cuba.

Major Dutch families such as Philipses were involved, others    had commercial ties with the British Caribbean colonies. By the mid-eighteenth century this family held over 52,000 acres in Westchester County and had one of the largest slave holdings.

By 1720 half the ships leaving New York were engaged in Caribbean slave trade. Slave auctions were held weekly and sometimes daily at the Wall Street slave market. Advertisements regularly appeared in newspapers- note Slave ads.

African Burial Ground

During the construction of the federal office tower in downtown Manhattan, the skeletal remains of over 400 slaves were discovered in graves. Of the 400 skeletons taken about 40 per cent were children under 15 years of age, the most common cause of the death was malnutrition, how? From examination of decayed teeth. The adult skeletons showed that many of these people died of unrelenting hard labor. Strain on the muscles and ligaments was so extreme that muscle attachments were commonly ripped away from the skeleton-taking chunks of bone with them-leaving the body in perpetual pain.

Showed that “colonial New York was just as dependent on slavery as many Southern cities, and in some cases ever more so.”

Slavery in Dutch New Amsterdam

The first Dutch agent of African ancestry who can be documented in the New York region was Jan Rodriguez in 1609. The first permanent European settlement in 1625 began when the Dutch West Indian Company established the village of New Amsterdam on Manhattan Island. From the start the Dutch had a labor shortage, the solution to merchants already engaged in the trans-Atlantic slave trade was to employ enslaved Africans clear the land, plant and harvest crops, and, to build houses, roads, fortifications and bridges. In 1626 a WIC ship brought eleven enslaved male Africans to the colony. Based on their names they were probably Africans from the southwest coast of Africa who were captured or purchased from the Portuguese.

Unlike the legal system in other slave colonies, Dutch laws did not mandate racial discrimination in New Amsterdam. Africans in the Dutch New Netherland colony could meet in groups, walk around the town without passes and own property. People of African ancestry could appeal to the Dutch courts for redress of grievances and even testify against Whites.

The “Land of the Blacks,” as it was known, covered the area that stretches from Greenwich Village north to Herald Square in midtown Manhattan today. In exchange for their freedom and land, each family agreed to pay taxes to WIC in corn, wheat and hogs every year.

Under Governor Peter Stuyvesant’s direction, a number of enslaved Africans became skilled caulkers, blacksmith, bricklayers and masons. In some cases, they were granted half-freedom , which meant they were still obligated to provide the WIC with labor when needed and that their children were not born free. Fort New Amsterdam was completed in 1635. Slaves built roads, cut timber and firewood, cleared land and burned limestone and oyster shells to make the lime used in outhouses and in burying the dead.

The enslaved Africans in the colony had a very ambiguous legal status. Dutch laws did not mandate racial discrimination in the colony. Africans could meet in groups, walk around town without passes and own property. People of African ancestry could appeal to the Dutch courts for appeal of grievances and even testify against Whites. In the portion of the colony beyond the wall stood a tract of land called “Land of the Blacks.” In exchange for their freedom and land, each family allowed to live there agreed to pay taxes to WIC in wheat, corn and hogs every year.

By 1654 the Dutch West India Company began to ship slaves to New Amsterdam more consistently, in larger numbers, and directly from Africa in an effort to develop New Amsterdam in a major North American slave port.

The variety of rights and privileges enjoyed by African slaves in New Amsterdam, relatively kind masters, good opportunities to form families, and access to courts and some forms of property-did not mitigate the fundamental facts of enslavement for Africans: involuntary, largely unpaid, life long servitude and ultimate lack of control over one’s individual and family life

Slave Auctions in Dutch New Amsterdam and Colonial America

Slave auctions took place regularly at a market on Wall Street. Between 1700 and 1774, over 7,000 slaves were imported into New York, most of them destined for sale to surrounding rural areas. This figure was dwarfed by the more than 200,000 brought into the southern colonies in these years.

Slave Auctions were advertised when it was known that a slave ship was due to arrive. Ads were placed in local newspapers advertising arrival of ships and slaves for

When the slave ship docked, the slaves would be taken off the ship and placed in a pen. There they would be washed and their skin covered with grease, or sometimes tar, to make them look more healthy. This was done so that they would fetch as much money as possible. They would also be branded with a hot iron to identify them as slaves. There is a folder labeled Slave Auction that includes images. There are two types of Slave auctions. Later on in 1711 the municipal government established a Meal Market on the east side of New York where enslaved Blacks were auctioned to new owners or hired out for a period of time.

British Takeover of New Amsterdam 1664 and policies towards slaves

In 1664 Colonel Richard Nicolls, commanding four British ships and several hundred soldiers, sailed into New Amsterdam harbor. A surprised Governor Stuyvesant surrendered without firing a shot. It was estimated that in 1664 about eight thousand Whites and seven hundred Africans lived in New Amsterdam.  To the dismay of Africans the English soon began to replace the Dutch lenient “half-slavery” with their own profit-driven, mean spirited bondage. Africans in Manhattan faced new hardships and challenges as they pressed their search for liberty and justice. In the British takeover folder are materials including a power point we will examine. Different from the Dutch ownership of slaves in British New York spread widely among the White population.

       Some Restrictions on Slaves:

  1. In 1677 a New York court stated that any person of color brought to trial was presumed to be a slave.

  2. Slaves had to carry a pass and could not leave their owners’ homes on Sundays.

  3. One city ordinance prohibited more than four Africans and Native Americans from meeting together.

Slavery in New York prior to the American Revolution and the resistance movement

Europeans employed slave men in skilled occupations such as carpentry, tailoring, blacksmithing, shoemaking, baking and butchering. Large numbers of male slaves were employed on the docks. Slave women, usually no more than one per household, aided White women with cooking, cleaning, and childcare.

Most Manhattan slave owners actively discouraged their slaves from marrying or having children.

New York lawmakers attempted to limit interactions among slaves in the city. Through regulations, New York lawmakers sought to control the cultural, social, and political independence of slaves.

The biggest fear of masters was that education and conversion to Christianity would encourage slaves to seek freedom. Records show that in New Amsterdam enslaved Africans collectively petitioned for wages as early as 1635 and used incessant colonial warfare. As slavery became more restrictive under the British, slaves expressed their discontent through various forms of resistance during the 18th century. Slaves stole more cash, clothing, and food from masters’ households and ran away more frequently than they had under the Dutch. frightening to which than such small acts of resistance was the threat of slave revolt.

An important theme during the 18th century in New York is the increasing resistance to bondage by enslaved Africans in the colonies.

Organized physical violence was one aspect of resistance, however, that organized, armed violence was a relatively rare occurrence during the 350-year history of slavery in the United States. Why were armed rebellions so infrequent? Slave masters monopolized armed power, severely restricting slaves’ access to weapons. Slave masters also closely monitored their slaves’ activities, limiting their movement and freedom of association. Under these circumstances, organization and planning were next to impossible. On those rare occasions when the enslaved escaped their masters’ purview, they faced yet other mechanisms of White control—militias, local patrols, and vigilantes. Rebels who avoided the net of surveillance and enacted their conspiracies were always dealt with in brutal fashion.

Hard usage” motivated two dozen slaves to stage an uprising in 1712 in which they set fires on the outskirts of the city and murdered the first Whites to respond. There followed a series of sadistic public executions, with some conspirators burned to death or broken on the wheel. The colonial Assembly quickly enacted a draconian series of laws governing slavery. These measures established separate courts for slaves and restricted private manumissions by requiring masters to post substantial bonds to cover the cost of public assistance in the event that a freed slave required it. The discovery of a “Great Negro Plot” in 1741, whose contours remain a matter of dispute among historians, led to more executions and further tightening of the laws governing slavery. As a result, few Black New Yorkers achieved freedom through legal means before the era of the Revolution.

Public hangings and decapitation were common punishments. Other rebels were gibbeted alive, burned alive, or broken on the wheel. In all of these instances, punishment was meant to demonstrate the totalizing effects of White supremacy, terrorizing those who remained enslaved. Remarkably, some slaves still embarked on what they must have known were suicide missions. Were the men and women who confronted their masters with violence so desperate that they preferred death to living in slavery? Or, did they really believe that they could be the exception and overthrow White supremacy? These are important questions to consider.

During the American Revolution resistance also meant joining British forces.

In the South, by the nineteenth century, running away to the North offered the virtue of a tenuous freedom; however, failed runaways also met with serious reprisals. Most did not try to escape. For those who remained enslaved, resistance took on more familiar everyday forms.

Of all the Black activists engaged in the struggle to end slavery and secure equal rights for African-Americans the most prominent with Frederick Douglas of Rochester, New York.

Ownership of slaves was widespread. Most worked as domestic laborers, on the docks, in artisan shops, or on small farms in the city’s rural hinterland. In modern-day Brooklyn, then a collection of farms and small villages, one-third of the population in 1771 consisted of slaves.

On the eve of the American Revolution, the city’s population of 19,000 included nearly 3,000 slaves, and some 20,000 slaves lived within 50 miles of Manhattan island.

Our Founding Fathers and Slavery

The existence of Slavery in the US was taken for granted by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787; there was little or no discussion of abolishing it. The Slave trade, however, was very much in contention.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 provided that an owner of his agent could seize a runaway and bring him or her before any judge or magistrate with “proof” of slave status, whereupon the official would issue a certificate of removal. Any person who interfered with the process became liable to a lawsuit by the owner.

The market for slaves was about to explode in volume and everyone knew it.

Prohibiting the African trade, as the New England delegation wanted to do, would create a grand bonanza for Virginia slaveholders-at the expense of South Carolina.

  • Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution reads: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.

Jefferson framed ending importation of persons as humanitarian act. Ending the African slave trade was protectionism on behalf of Virginia. It kept out the cheaper African imports so as to keep the price of domestically raised people high.

The Great Awakening in New York 1740s through the American Revolution

Beginning in the 1740s, a time of religious revival led New York City Whites and Blacks to reconsider the morality of slavery. National, state and local conventions of Black activists became important weapons in the battle against slavery.

The struggle for freedom and equality required the development of African-American community institutions and indigenous leadership. Quakers began to call upon their members to free their slaves.

Remember the New York economy relied too heavily on slavery for Whites to give up the system so easily. However, the influence of the Great Awakening convinced New York City slaves, and a few Whites more strongly of African-American’s rights to freedom.

The first emancipation proclamation in American history preceded Abraham Lincoln’s by nearly ninety years. Its author was the Earl of Dunmore, the royal governor of colonial Virginia, who in November 1775 promised freedom “all indentured servants, negroes, or others” belonging to rebels if they enlisted in the army.

Gouverneur Morris 1777

“The rights of human nature and the principles of our holy religion call up us to depense the blessings of freedom to all mankind…….It is therefore recommended to the legislatures of New York to take measures consistent with the public safety for abolishing domestic slavery. “

The founding of the New York Manumission Society in 1785 led by group of influential White New York City men gave enslaved Black people new allies in the struggle against slavery. The society offered legal assistance to Blacks seeking freedom, worked strenuously to oppose kidnapping of free Blacks and slave catching in the city, brought to court captains engaged illegally in the African slave trade, and sponsored antislavery lectures and literature.

In 1787 the society founded the first of several African Free Schools for free Black and enslaved children in New York Segments of the New York press also played an active role in the battle to end slavery in the United States.

In 1799, New York’s legislature finally adopted a measure for gradual abolition. It freed slave children born after July 4, 1799, but after they had served “apprenticeships” of twenty-eight years for men and twenty-five for women.

By 1816, the American Colonization Society was founded by American Whites, including many abolitionists. The society directed its efforts toward removing from the country Blacks already free. A number of abolitionists believed that racism was so deeply embedded in American life that Blacks could never enjoy freedom except by emigrating. The Black mobilization against colonization became a key catalyst for the rise of new, militant abolitionism in the 1830’s.

In 1817, the legislature decreed that all slaves who had been living at the time of 1799 act would be emancipated on July 4, 1827.  WHILE SLAVERY NO LONGER EXISTED, NEW YORK’S PROSPERITY INCREASINGLY DEPENDED ON ITS RELATIONS WITH THE SLAVE SOUTH. AS THE COTTON KINGDOM FLOURISHED, SO DID ITS ECONOMIC CONNECTIONS WITH NEW YORK.

The economy of Brooklyn was very tied to slavery. Warehouses along its waterfront were filled with the products of slave labor-cotton, tobacco, and especially sugar from Louisiana and Cuba. In the 1850’s sugar refining was Brooklyn’s largest industry.

During the American Revolution, slaves that sided with the British found employment reconstructing the damaged parts of the city and working for the British army as servants, cooks, and laundresses.  For the first time in their lives, they received wages and were effectively treated as free. When the British evacuated Philadelphia in 1778, moreB refugees arrived.

When the British sailed out of New York harbor in 1783, they carried not only tens of thousands of White soldiers, sailors, and loyalists, but over 3,000 Blacks most of whom had been freed in accordance with British proclamations. They ended up in Nova Scotia, England and Sierra Leone, a colony established by British abolitionists on the west coast of Africa later in the decade.

By 1830, more than a dozen Black congregations rented or owned buildings in lower Manhattan alone, including the African Methodist Episcopal Church, The Demeter Presbyterian Church and the First Colored Presbyterian Church. In 1832 the New York City Anti-Slavery Society was formed.

New York’s African American community supported the first Black newspaper in the United States, Freedom’s Journal.

Horace Greeley, the founder and an editor of the New York Tribune, took a strong moral position favoring the abolition of slavery.

Reverend Henry Ward Beecher was a leading opponent of slavery. Beecher raised money in his Brooklyn church, Plymouth Church, to purchase the freedom of slaves in symbolic protests against the institution.

The battle for social equality in New York led to civil disobedience. African-Americans even when legally free, were continually at risk. In an 1836 letter to the New York Sun, David Ruggles described the kidnapping of a free Black on the streets of New York.The presence of the rapidly growing free Black community ready to take to the streets to try to protect fugitive slaves would make New York a key battleground in the national struggle over slavery. Quickly Black institutions emerged-fraternal societies, literary clubs, and 10 Black churches. New York City replaced Philadelphia as the “capital” of free Black America. Africans can now been seen all over New York, many lived near the docks or in the 5 points.

The Underground Railroad in New York

New York City was a crucial way station to the metropolitan corridor  through which fugitive slaves made their way from the Upper South through Philadelphia and on the upstate New York, New England and Canada.

Women were important conductors on the UGRR. One important station in New York City was the Colored Sailors’ Home, where Mary Marshall Lyons, the owner’s wife, fed and disguised more than one thousand refugees.

The unique socioeconomic structure of Weeksville, a Black township, offered a safety net for fugitives, while Brooklyn itself was [a] Mecca of abolitionist culture, home to several notable antislavery pastors, authors, activists and others who were key to the call for freedom.

Profiting from Slavery

Documents found at the New-York Historical Society shown that the founders of Brown Bros. Harriman, based in New York City, built the bank by lending millions of dollars to Southern planters and arranging for the shipment and sale of slave-grown cotton in New England and Great Britain.

Economic historian Douglas North found that the North provided “not only the services to finance, transport, insure, and market the South’s cotton, but also supplied the South with manufactured goods.

Despite the efforts of Whites, in New York, the slave system supported the development of New York as a commercial and financial center, by 1860 it was one of the world’s major metropolises.

Nautilus Insurance company, wrote over 300 life insurance policies on enslaves Africans in the American South. Aetna

uncovered 7 life insurance policies taken out by plantation owners for enslaved Africans.

As a result of the cotton trade, the port of the New York exceeded the combined shipping of its two major American business rivals, Boston and Philadelphia, in both volume and the value of goods being processed.

Commercial ties between North and South also provided New York City merchants with other economic benefits. Southern merchants and their families made annual pilgrimages to the city, ordering imported and domestic luxury goods and patronizing hotels, restaurants and resorts.

Many New York merchants championed conciliation with the South and compromise with slavery even after the Southern states started to secede.

The economic ties between the Southern planters and New York merchants were so strong that at the end of the Civil War, prewar commercial arrangements were quickly reestablished.

When the Civil War came to New York

Of course, New York’s role in the Civil War was critical to the Union’s success. New York contributed more soldiers, sustained more casualties, and also contributed more war materiel and financial support for the war than any other state. Remember, New York was arguably the most pro-South, pro-slavery city in the North because it had a very long and deep involvement in the international cotton trade. Even though many New Yorkers were pro-slavery and opposed the Civil War, once it happened, being New Yorkers, they figured out how to make a profit out of it. The banks lent great amounts of money to the Union's war effort, and much of that money was spent right back in New York on uniforms and horses and food and other supplies.

While the Civil War pitted North against South, some locations confounded that stark regional split. New York was one of those places, a city of divided loyalties and complex class, racial, and economic interests. While most New Yorkers supported the war at its outset, significant forces urged conciliation with the Confederacy. From Wall Street financiers, to commercial shippers, to merchants selling manufactured goods to a South that produced little of its own, the New York City economy depended heavily on southern cotton.

When the Civil War began in 1861, large numbers of New York City’s White workers did not embrace the fight to preserve the Union. Many resented the war effort, which brought economic hardship and increasing unemployment to working-class neighborhoods. *Competition for jobs between Irish and Black workers, already intense before the war, increased dramatically, and racial tensions mounted in work places and in working-class neighborhoods throughout the city.

The National Conscription Act exacerbated long-simmering class tensions and the deprivations brought on by wartime inflation; it was especially unpopular among the city’s immigrant White working class. When it was enacted on July 11, 1863 (Draft Riots ), it touched off the worst rioting Americans had ever seen. People and buildings representing Protestant missionaries, Republican draft officials, war production, wealthy businessmen, and African Americans suffered the worst of the crowds’ wrath, and after four days more than 119 New Yorkers were dead. Soon after the riots were quelled by federal troops, the northern war effort finally started to bear fruit and the city’s economy rebounded (aided by the re-legalization of the cotton trade with the rebel states).

Nearly three-quarters of the Black men of eligible age volunteered for the Union army. Because White soldiers did not trust them in actual combat, most Black soldiers were assigned to support roles, though they sometimes engaged with the enemy. New York registered 4,125 soldiers in its three Black regiments, the 20th, 26th, and 31st United States Colored Troops. Trained at Riker's and Hart's islands in the East River in early 1864, they were dispatched to Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas, respectively. The 31st was at Appomattox Court House when Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his army.

Almost all the commissioned officers in U.S. Colored Troops regiments were White. David J. Pilsworth (1841-1895) enlisted as a private, suffered wounds in 1862, and was promoted to a captain of the 20th USCT after his recovery.

On June 17, 1864, Ellen Anderson, a respectable-looking widow, was ordered to leave the "Whites only" car of the 8th Avenue Railroad. "I said I was sick and wished to ride up home. I said I had lost my husband in the war. The conductor said 'he did not care for me, or my husband either,' and he and the police officer threw me off the car." She sued the railroad company and won. By July, all the streetcars in New York were open to Blacks.

Until the secretary of war intervened, city authorities forbade Blacks from marching behind Abraham Lincoln's body from City Hall to the Hudson River docks. Two thousand Blacks brought up the end of the march, carrying a banner that read "Abraham Lincoln, Our Emancipator." By that time, the body had already left the city.

For Black people, the years after the draft riots and the Civil War meant an increasingly fragmented community scattered through northern New Jersey, Westchester, Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island, but these distinctive neighborhoods developed their own civic, religious, and social organizations.

In New York, one final battle remained to preserve inequality and prevent Black suffrage. In April 1869, the state legislature ratified the Fifteenth Amendment to the federal constitution, guaranteeing the right to vote to Black men. But a New York State constitutional amendment for equal rights was voted down in November 1869, losing by 70-30% in New York City. In January, the new Democratic majority in Albany repealed the federal ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment by a vote of 69-55.

Despite New York's reversal, enough states did approve the Fifteenth Amendment, which was certified on March 30, 1870. Black Americans took the opportunity to celebrate a momentous victory.

On a self-titled album in 1969, the rock group The Band released “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down,” a song depicting the final days of the Confederacy in 1865.

What do you think of the article? Let us know below.

Now read Richard’s piece on the 1692 Massacre of Glencoe here.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones
CategoriesBlog Post
5 CommentsPost a comment

Aaron Burr's life has always tangled itself in controversy. From killing the first Secretary of the Treasury and key figure in the Federalist Party, Alexander Hamilton, to being the defendant of the United States' first treason case, Aaron Burr was well known for a lot of questionable decisions and bad luck. However, none of his decisions were as objectively manipulative, callous, and greedy as purposefully letting New York City suffer with tainted water for the sake of building a bank. Haley Booker-Lauridson explains.

An early 19th century painting of Aaron Burr.

An early 19th century painting of Aaron Burr.

The New York Water System

Back when New York was New Amsterdam, the water sources were from nearby ponds, streams, and wells, and continued that way for many years. Without a waterworks system, the city's waste ran into the same water it drank from, and distributing drinking water to various areas of the city proved difficult. This troubled Christopher Colles, an Irish engineer and inventor who emigrated to Philadelphia in 1771, just four short years before the Revolution.

In 1775, he began organizing a project he proposed, constructing a water distribution system in the heart of New York. This system used a steam engine pump to extract water from various wells into a reservoir, which would then distribute the water throughout the city in pipes. However, the Revolutionary War came to the city a year later and the project had to be put on hold, and the British soldiers soon destroyed what was left of the fledgling water system.

Though he made several attempts at creating various waterways and different systems in the newly formed United States, none of his projects came to fruition. The water in New York was left in a state of rapid pollution. Without a way to draw clean water, the citizens of New York City drank water steeped in animal, human, and industrial waste. Water distribution was another problem; fires could not consistently be quelled without a distribution system that could quickly get the water to the flames.

With a population of 60,515 people in the city, the waters became increasingly dangerous. By 1798, up to 2,000 people died of yellow fever, which doctors attributed to the filthy water people were drinking. By that time, New Yorkers desperately needed a plan to bring clean water to the city.

 

"Pure and Wholesome Water"

Nearly 24 years after Colles proposed a water distribution system, a bill to secure water from the Bronx River was drafted and sent to the New York State Assembly in 1799.

Aaron Burr, State Assemblyman and Democratic-Republican, worked to convince the Assembly to let the city and state use a private company for their water. While Democratic-Republicans were the main supporters of the bill, they received help from an unlikely ally, Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton campaigned for the Federalist Assemblymen to reach across the aisle. As New York had become his home when he emigrated to America in 1772, it is easy to see why he might want to turn the water bill into a bipartisan decision. The water was terribly polluted and toxic, and Aaron Burr had partnered with him on several occasions, including working as defense attorneys in the first murder trial in the United States. Having trusted Burr and having believed in the cause for a waterworks system, Hamilton convinced his fellow Federalists to back the creation of the Manhattan Water Company.

What Hamilton, and many Assemblymen, did not know was that Burr, just before submitting the bill for its final approval, slipped in a clause allowing the company to use "surplus capital" however it chose, as long as it followed state and federal law. The bill passed through with this clause on April 2, 1799, and the Manhattan Company was created to supply New York with "pure and wholesome water."

This small, unassuming clause transformed what was intended to be a water system for New York into a bank. Burr intended to establish a bank all along. He and other Democratic-Republicans inherently distrusted the First Bank of the United States and its branch in New York, as it was linked with Federalist politics. They feared discrimination in receiving credit and loans, and also desired the power to control campaign finance with their own bank. They wanted to establish a bank manned by their own political party, and schemed to use the city's water crisis to manufacture one right under the Federalists' noses.

 

The Manhattan Water Company's Legacy

By September 1, 1799, the Bank of the Manhattan Company opened, eventually becoming the oldest branch of JP Morgan Chase, and remains a financial institution today.

While the Manhattan Water Company was ostensibly a front for a bank, it did provide the city's first waterworks system. Shoddily put together, it constructed a cheap, crude network of wooden water mains throughout the city, by coring out yellow pine logs for pipes and fastening them together with iron bands.

The system was sub-par at best. It froze during the winter and the tree roots easily pierced through the log pipes, causing terrible back-ups. Even when the system worked, the people suffered through pitifully low water pressure. And, despite having permission to get clean water that ran down the Bronx River, Burr chose to source water from the polluted sources the city tried to get away from.

The Manhattan Water Company continued laying wooden pipes in the 1820s, even though other U.S. cities began using iron clad pipes. It remained the only drinking water supplier until 1842, leaving people with unreliable and bad water for over forty years.

As the water system floundered and the bank flourished, Aaron Burr experienced very little but misfortune from then on. Hamilton made it his duty to keep Burr out of influential public offices, famously campaigning against Burr during the 1800 election, and later in New York's gubernatorial race in 1804. Hamilton often negatively featured Burr in his newspaper, the New York Post. He likely would have continued had he not been fatally wounded in a duel with the man in July of 1804. Burr faced political exile that solidified when he was tried for treason in 1807, eventually fleeing to Europe for several years before returning to the U.S. and living as a perpetual debtor until his death in 1836.

 

What do you think of Aaron Burr? Let us know below.

References

Beatrice G. Reubens, “Burr, Hamilton and the Manhattan Company. Part I: Gaining the Charter,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXII (December, 1957), 578–607.

Beatrice G. Reubens, “Burr, Hamilton and the Manhattan Company. Part II: Launching a Bank,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXIII (March, 1958), 100–25.

“New York City (NYC) Yellow Fever Epidemic - 1795 to 1804” http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/nycdata/disasters/yellow_fever.html

"The History of the Water Mains in New York City" https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/wood_water_pipes_history.shtml.

New York Laws, 22nd Sess., Ch. LXXXIV.